The Global Risk Forum (GRF)
The Global Risk Forum (GRF)
The Global Risk Forum (GRF)
  • CHF0.00 0
    Cart review

    No products in the cart.

Last Meeting

Aug 29, 2025- minutes and comments
 
Comments:
1) GRF mandate & operating boundary
  • Clarify whether GRF is a neutral forum (outputs handed off) or also a driver of adoption (delivery model).
  • Define the full lifecycle of outputs once handed to external recipients (acknowledgement, status updates, accountability, closure).
  • Confirm whether adoption tracking sits within GRF or is handled at GCRI level.

CB position (Arts. 1, 3, 6, 9–10, 13; Bylaw 6): GRF is a neutral forum that produces decision-ready outputs and tracks adoption without executing third-party programs. Adoption tracking is part of GRF’s remit; delivery remains with recipients or partners. CB may escalate where uptake is superficial.

2) Legal status & safe-harbour of outputs
  • State whether outputs are non-binding advisory by default and whether any safe-harbour applies to their use.
  • Specify that council members operate on a non-fiduciary, limited-liability basis unless expressly agreed otherwise.

CB position (Arts. 5, 10, 13, 18; Bylaw 11; ECT-5): Outputs are non-binding advisory with provenance; council roles are non-fiduciary/limited liability. Provide safe-harbour language for good-faith use.

3) Authority lines & escalation
  • Clarify coordination and decision flow among the Central Bureau, Leadership Council, and Chairs (who decides, who executes, who clears).
  • Determine whether an escalation path (via CB) should trigger when adoption is superficial or blocked.

CB position (Arts. 6–7, 9, 12; Annex F/G): Board = reserved matters; EM = delegated execution; CB = non-executive clearance & registers. CB call-in on sensitive items (independence, sanctions, data privacy/security).

4) Election integrity, discipline & roles
  • Confirm election tech standards (identity, secrecy, verifiability, audit) and whether dates/timelines in the draft resolutions are fixed.
  • Define who oversees enforcement and whether Trustees may suspend/sanction/remove council members; set breach levels and the penalty matrix.
5) KPIs & effectiveness metrics
  • Elevate uptake/implementation rate (not only output volume) as a primary KPI, including integration into external frameworks.
  • Ensure the feedback loop (5-day acknowledgement; 2-week status) is more than procedural and ties to measurable adoption.

CB position (Arts. 10, 13; Bylaw 6): Uptake/implementation rate is a primary KPI; the action loop must be substantive, tied to milestones.

6) Financial neutrality, caps & shortfall planning
  • Clarify whether listed contribution amounts function as caps to prevent influence concentration.
  • Establish treatment and caps for gifts, philanthropy, and in-kind contributions; create a Gifts/Donations & In-Kind Registry; explicitly exclude political donations.
  • Define prioritization rules if the USD 35M top-line target is not reached; specify whether regional strategy depends on regional funding.

CB position (Art. 14; ECT-6): Prevent concentration; log gifts/in-kind; plan for shortfall.

7) Sovereign contributors & conflicts
  • Define “sovereign” contributor (including state-controlled entities) and set a percentage cap of total budget to preserve neutrality.
  • Apply additional firewalls where a sovereign is directly affected by a GRF output.
  • Address conflicts when donors/contributors are also recipients of GRF outputs.

CB position (Arts. 3, 14, 16; ECT-4/6): Define “sovereign” (incl. state-controlled entities); enhanced KYC/sanctions; Independence Impact Assessment (IIA); recusal walls when directly affected.

8) Regionalization, incorporation & continuity risk
  • Clarify whether regional operations depend on achieving regional funding targets.
  • Set contingencies if incorporation in a region (e.g., MENA) is delayed; confirm whether the financial framework is pooled or ring-fenced by region.
  • Plan for disruptions if a sovereign is sanctioned or a donor fails AML/KYC.

CB position (Arts. 6, 10, 19; Bylaw 6): Hybrid funding—core pooled; add-ons ring-fenced. Use interim host MoUs if incorporation lags; publish continuity plans.

9) Data integrity & model governance
  • Address disclosure bias risks in datasets and indices, especially where sources rely on organizational self-reporting and may miss emerging-market realities.
  • Commit to data-source transparency, robustness, and model validation (testing the system before scale).
10) Convenings & calendar discipline
  • Confirm whether there is an in-person Geneva meeting next year and agree a working window to enable planning.
  • Clarify near-term meeting cadence and notification process for the next session; define the path through to 2026.

CB position (Art. 10 & prior resolutions): Geneva 2026 working window: 1–15 July 2026; monthly GRF sessions; quarterly Board. Consult column in right section for full calendar.

Next Meeting

No event found!

PDF: ECT – GRF

0%

The ECT-GRF is a Swiss private-law, multilateral framework that links GRF with GCRI, GRA, NSF, and NE Labs to coordinate policy/science, risk-finance, programs/alliances, and R&D on neutral, auditable rails. It establishes the Joint Committee (one vote per Party), channels all material actions through each Party’s Central Bureau (CB) for clearance and provenance, and hard-codes safeguards on independence, IP/data licensing, privacy/export controls, revenue/cost-sharing, and Swiss-rules arbitration (seat: Geneva).

Board ask: approve GRF’s negotiation mandate, red-lines and annex set (ECT-I/D/P/T/R/V/H/G/L), authorize the Chief Global Steward/CB to issue clearances and execute the accession instrument, and instruct publication in the Council Gazette upon signature.

See also:

PDF: CHARTER – GRF

0%

The Charter is GRF’s constitutional instrument as a Swiss association (Verein) registered in Zug with its principal base in Geneva. It codifies mission and public-benefit purpose (DRR/DRF/DRI), independence and non-affiliation, membership classes (incl. sovereign/state-level pathways), and the governance spine: General Assembly, Board of Trustees (7 by end-2026), Leadership Council, non-executive Central Bureau (Privy Council), Executive Management, Regional/Thematic Chairs and program boards. It fixes reserved matters, representation, amendments, dissolution/asset lock, and transitional timelines (Chairs elected each January; executives hired as funding matures).

Board ask: endorse the final Charter text for GA ratification, confirm the transitional roadmap, and approve Standing Orders and the CB financing rule (CB funded from one-third of GRF revenue channels).

See also:

PDF: BYLAW – GRF

0%

The Bylaws operationalize the Charter with RACI and process detail: authorities and Delegation of Authority (DoA), signatory matrix, elections (trustees/chairs/executives), compensation policies (§8.1A/§8.2A/§8.3A), election-integrity tech stack, programs/tracks/regionalization, Inter-Nexus (ECT) integration, meeting and quorum rules, transparency/records (Council Register & Gazette), finance/treasury controls and audit, data/security/privacy baselines, ethics/conflicts & RPT, accreditation/protocol & safety (Geneva venues), emergency powers/succession, amendments, and full committee charters (Audit & Risk, Finance & Investment, Nominating & Governance, Ethics & Compliance, Technology & Data, ECT Liaison).

Board ask: approve the Bylaws and annex pack (Annex F DoA, G Signatory, H Treasury, J Independence/IIA, K Election Code, L InfoSec, N Conflicts/RPT), set the effective date, and instruct CB/EM to publish the implementation workplan and compliance templates within 30 days.

See also:
Have questions?