State & Government
Council
The consultative forum for government officials, policymakers, regulators, and public sector leaders coordinating cross-border risk governance, national resilience frameworks, and international cooperation protocols.
- State & Government
- Academia & Universities
- Media & Civil Society
- Industry & Standards
- Community & Indigenous
- Leadership Council
- Industry lane convenedToday
- Q1 synthesis published2d
- 14 proposals reviewed1w
- 3 items approved1w
- House Briefing2nd Tue
- Board Session Q2EoM
National governments face polycrisis convergence—simultaneous climate emergencies, pandemic preparedness deficits, critical infrastructure vulnerabilities, sovereign debt pressures, and AI governance vacuums. The 2024 OECD Global Risks Survey confirms 78% of member states lack adequate cross-ministry coordination mechanisms for cascading systemic shocks.
The State & Government Council operates as a neutral Track 1.5 forum for pre-crisis policy alignment, regulatory harmonization, and early warning synthesis—enabling peer jurisdictions to coordinate without formal treaty obligations while maintaining sovereign decision-making authority.
Cross-border regulatory dialogue without formal treaty process—Track 1.5 diplomacy for risk coordination
Consultative coordination that respects jurisdictional boundaries—no binding authority over national decision-making
Pre-crisis intelligence synthesis and horizon scanning for emerging cross-border systemic risks
Decision-ready briefs, regulatory alignment maps, and comparative policy syntheses
| # | Mandate Function | Framework | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Convene heads of national risk agencies, regulators, and senior policymakers from OECD and partner jurisdictions | OECD GRG | Active |
| 2 | Facilitate pre-crisis intelligence sharing through Chatham House protocols and controlled routing | Track 1.5 | Active |
| 3 | Produce regulatory alignment maps and comparative policy syntheses on cross-border systemic risks | ISO 31000 | Active |
| 4 | Support Sendai Framework implementation through national resilience coordination pathways | UN DRRS | Active |
| 5 | Maintain standing committees: Critical Infrastructure, Cyber Sovereignty, Climate Adaptation, Fiscal Stability | NIST CSF | Active |
| 6 | Coordinate pandemic preparedness and health security protocols across regional health authorities | IHR 2005 | Active |
| 7 | Support AI governance framework development aligned with EU AI Act and emerging international standards | GPAI | Emerging |
All sessions observe Track 1.5 diplomacy standards. National positions are protected. No binding commitments without sovereign consent.
Council does not influence internal government affairs, electoral processes, or domestic policy outside risk coordination scope.
Sensitive national security information handled through controlled lanes with appropriate clearance protocols.
Convenes, synthesizes, produces public-safe outputs, routes
Receives pre-docketed items, deliberates, issues determinations
Recurring governance domains—guidance, coordination, standards
Specific routed issues with defined outputs and end dates
| Decision Area | CB | Chair | RRO | COI | Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agenda Items Intake | R | P | — | — | — |
| Proposal Shortlisting | A | R | — | — | — |
| Sensitive Routing | P | R | A | — | — |
| COI Recusal | — | — | — | A | V |
| Issuance (Public-Safe) | I | A | — | — | — |
| Governance Decisions | R | R | — | — | A |
| Constitution Changes | — | P | — | — | A |
- Cross-border regulatory alignment on systemic risks
- Critical infrastructure interdependency mapping
- National resilience framework benchmarking
- Pandemic preparedness protocol coordination
- Cyber sovereignty and digital governance dialogue
- Climate adaptation policy synthesis
- Fiscal stability and sovereign debt risk coordination
- AI governance and emerging technology frameworks
- Binding treaty commitments or obligations
- Electoral interference or domestic political influence
- Classified intelligence sharing without protocols
- Military or defense coordination outside civilian scope
- Sovereign debt restructuring negotiations
- Trade agreement negotiations or tariff coordination
- Sanctions implementation or enforcement actions
- Procurement, contracting, or vendor selection
| Output Type | Classification | Format | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority Synthesis | Public-Safe | Record ID + Summary + Routing + Actions | Published |
| House Recap | Public-Safe | Session summary + Next steps | Published |
| Routing Summary | Controlled | Decision matrix + Owner assignment | Circulated |
| Action Register | Controlled | Owner + Due window + Completion | Tracked |
| Standards Guidance | Public-Safe | Recommendation + Rationale | Published |
| Board Minutes | Public-Safe | Decisions + Rationale + Distribution | Published |
Council participation is a professional subscription service administered by the Nexus Council Bureau (GCRI Canada). This is not organizational membership with equity, voting rights, or legal entitlements in GCRI or GRF entities. Council subscribers gain access to governance forums, working lanes, and professional coordination—they do not become members, shareholders, or directors of any corporate entity through subscription alone.
The Nexus Council Bureau provides professional coordination services for GRF Council operations, including session facilitation, docket management, synthesis production, and subscriber administration. All council subscriptions are processed and serviced through this bureau.
- Subscription = Service access
- No equity or ownership stake
- No voting rights in entities
- No fiduciary obligations
- Renewable annually
Leaders operating at country/national level bringing local priorities, regulatory context, and ground-truth intelligence into global governance discourse.
- National council sessions
- National Chair convenings
- Priority slate submissions
- Working lane participation
Leaders synthesizing cross-border issues, aligning regional constraints, and building coherence across national boundaries for systemic risk coordination.
- Regional council sessions
- Regional Chair convenings
- Cross-border synthesis
- Docket sponsorship rights
Senior leaders shaping global themes, stewarding integrity discipline, and supporting governance shipping at the highest cross-regional level.
- Global council sessions
- Cross-council coordination
- Theme framing influence
- Board pathway eligibility
| Capability | Affiliate | Fellow | Patron |
|---|---|---|---|
| Council Session Access | National | Regional | Global |
| Priority Slate Submission | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Working Lane Participation | Assigned | ✓ | ✓ |
| Docket Sponsorship | — | Regional | Cross-Council |
| Theme Framing Input | — | Limited | ✓ |
| Cross-Border Synthesis | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Board Pathway Eligibility | — | After 24mo | After 12mo |
| Governance Shipping Readiness | — | — | ✓ |
Council subscription is not a prerequisite for board consideration, but sustained participation in good standing demonstrates governance competence and organizational fit. After minimum tenure, qualified subscribers may be invited to explore formal governance positions.
Select tier aligned to your operational scope
Maintain good standing for minimum tenure
Evidence governance competence & contribution
Receive invitation to governance consideration
| Patron → Board Consideration | 12 months |
| Fellow → Board Consideration | 24 months |
| Affiliate → Fellow Upgrade | 12 months |
- Consistent session participation (>80%)
- Quality contributions to working lanes
- Demonstrated professional expertise
- Integrity and boundary compliance
- Constructive synthesis contributions
- Senior decision-maker or strategic advisor
- Authoritative voice on sector/regional priorities
- Seeks structured governance engagement
- Committed to regular participation
- Values confidentiality and discipline
- Interested in governance career pathway
- Seeking sales or vendor pitch venue
- Cannot commit to monthly schedule
- Expects binding decision authority
- Seeking networking events only
- Cannot maintain communication discipline
- Seeking immediate board placement
House Briefings: 2nd Tuesday monthly (2h)
Quarterly governance shipping reviews (2h)
Working lane participation scales with availability
Governance Framework
Decision lanes, workflow, outputs, and structures that make council work disciplined and credible.
Hear priorities, proposals, blockers, community spotlights; publish public-safe recap; route follow-up.
Refine routed items into governance-grade drafts, issue briefs, standards needs, decision-ready language.
Decide governance items that are pre-docketed and decision-ready (constitution, elections, formal approvals).
Members consult within their sector/jurisdiction on what is materially changing.
Official intake: priorities, proposals, blockers, spotlight, routing.
CB compiles, screens for public-safe wording and boundary compliance.
Chairs approve shortlist, speaking order, routing recommendations.
Public gateway: strategic briefing, spotlights, community proposals.
Public-safe recap, routing summary, action list with owners.
Routed items move into drafting, coordination, standards shaping.
Decision-grade matters shipped with pre-docketed agenda.
| Decision Type | Council | Committee | Board |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shortlist & spotlight selection | Approves | — | — |
| Routing to follow-up lane | Approves | Recommends | — |
| Create new docket | Proposes | Approves | Oversight |
| Issue public-safe outputs | Approves | Approves | — |
| Issue controlled outputs | — | Approves | Oversight |
| Governance/constitution changes | Proposes | Drafts | Decides |
| Elections & appointments | — | — | Decides |
| Integrity & COI rulings | — | Reviews | Decides |
| Emergency suspension | Proposes | Recommends | Decides |
Trust & Integrity
Boundaries, protections, and hygiene standards that preserve neutrality and enable candid participation.
GRF never executes, procures, underwrites, or prices on behalf of members.
GRF never endorses products, vendors, or organizations—participation ≠ endorsement.
Never confirm who attended or didn't attend sessions—privacy by design.
No pricing, commercial terms, underwriting parameters, or market allocation.
Governance posture only—no operational instructions or emergency dispatch.
Corrections must be explicit and documented in the record with timestamps.
Can be published without restriction. Neutral summaries, routing decisions, action lists, and public recaps.
Restricted to authorized participants. May contain draft positions, pre-decisional material, or coordination details.
Limited access on need-to-know basis. Integrity matters, personnel issues, or legally privileged content.
Participant lists are not published by default. Attendance is never confirmed or denied publicly—privacy by design.
Sensitive issues can be routed to controlled lanes with appropriate access restrictions—no public exposure.
Concerns about integrity, coercion, or misrepresentation can be raised through protected channels—confidential handling.
Retaliation against participants for good-faith contributions is prohibited and treated as an integrity incident.
No pricing, fee structures, or rate discussions
No terms, conditions, or contract details
No market division or customer allocation
No underwriting parameters or risk pricing
No competitor-sensitive strategies
No customer or supplier coordination
Monthly Member Habits
What to do each month to be a contributing member in good standing.
Top 3 priorities, proposals, blockers via official form.
Review compiled shortlist, flag items needing clarification.
Join public session, prepare time-boxed contribution.
Stay connected with sector. Value from genuine local truth.
Complete action items within windows, report back.
Never execute, procure, price, or endorse on behalf of GRF.
Council Calendar
House Briefings on the second Tuesday of each month. Board sessions quarterly.
Public consultative session: strategic briefing, priority spotlights, community proposals, routing decisions, and synthesis.
Closed decision session: pre-docketed governance items, constitutional matters, elections, and formal approvals only.
Downloads & Templates
Standard templates and guidance documents for effective participation.
Priority Slate Template
Monthly submission template with fields for priorities, proposals, blockers, and routing requests.
Access TemplateSpeaking Script Guide
Time-boxed speaking format for House presentations: Problem → Proposal → Blocker → Ask.
View GuideBoundary Reference Card
Quick reference for red lines, stop-line scripts, and handling classes.
View ReferenceSubmit national risk priorities, regulatory challenges, and cross-border coordination needs
Propose regulatory harmonization items for inter-governmental coordination
Submit national resilience programs and cross-border cooperation proposals
Register your government agency or department for council participation
New Here? Start in 90 Seconds
Choose Your Tier
Affiliate (National), Fellow (Regional), or Patron (Global)
Submit Priority Slate
Top 3 priorities, proposals, blockers, one community spotlight
Attend House Briefing
Second Tuesday, time-boxed contribution
Watch for Recap
See what moved and routing summary
Join Committee/Docket
If assigned or invited
Council Directory
Multi-stakeholder councils organized by domain. Each council convenes distinct stakeholder groups with shared governance interests.
State & Government Council
For public sector leaders, policymakers, and government officials coordinating on cross-border governance challenges.
Academia & Universities Council
For researchers, academics, and university leaders contributing evidence-based insights to risk governance.
Media & Civil Society Council
For journalists, NGO leaders, and civil society representatives ensuring transparency and public accountability.
Industry & Standards Council
For industry leaders and standards bodies coordinating on technical standards and market conduct.
Community & Indigenous Council
For community leaders and indigenous representatives ensuring local voices shape global governance.
Leadership Council
Cross-council coordination body for senior leaders driving strategic alignment and governance shipping.
Community Proposals
The public doorway for ground truth—structured submissions that ensure the House hears directly from communities, practitioners, and local leaders.
What is a Community Proposal?
A Community Proposal is a structured, public-facing submission enabling the public, expert communities, practitioners, and local leaders to bring priorities, problems, and solution initiatives into the monthly House Briefing. Community Proposals are not petitions, announcements, sponsorship slots, or deal pitches—they are a disciplined way to make proposals auditable, comparable, and routable.
✓ What Proposals Are For
- Surface urgent priorities invisible to institutional channels
- Present solution-forward initiatives for improvement and replication
- Identify blockers (policy, coordination, standards, data, capacity)
- Provide real-world proposals that can be captured and routed
- Create a credibility loop: issues heard, recorded, and tracked
✕ What Proposals Are NOT For
- Vendor selection, partner appointment, procurement steering
- Pricing, underwriting, deal terms, fundraising, solicitation
- Operational dispatch, emergency instructions, claims/settlement
- Naming individuals as "approved," "endorsed," or "non-compliant"
- Political campaigning, reputational attacks, roster disclosure
The Core Promise
Public Doorway
Reliable access for ground truth
Safe Format
Disciplined, structured presentation
Routable Follow-Up
Clear lanes for action
Issuance Loop
Community voices become tracked governance work
From Submission to House
Community Proposals follow a disciplined six-step flow ensuring the public session remains safe and credible.
Submit
Always open. Proposals collected continuously.
Screen
Check boundary compliance & public-safe wording.
Shortlist
Select based on urgency, diversity, solution quality.
Chair Approval
Approve selection, set speaking order.
Present
Time-boxed presentation to the House.
Route & Issue
Recap, routing summary, action list.
Possible Outcomes
Public Acknowledgement
Recorded in synthesis; no follow-up lane assigned. Tracked for future reference.
Controlled Follow-Up Lane
Working lane formed or committee picks it up for drafting, coordination, or standards.
Board-Lane Escalation
Only for institutional governance decisions in decision-ready form.
Who Can Submit
Local organizations, coalitions, grassroots groups representing frontline priorities.
Professional bodies, individual experts with evidence and implementation experience.
Public institutions, community-facing agencies (public-safe contributions only).
Submissions encouraged from underrepresented communities and frontline contexts. Industry experts may submit non-commercial, non-competitive content only.
House-Ready Criteria
Public-Safe
Discussed openly without sensitive details
Solution-Forward
Realistic next step, not just a complaint
Bounded & Specific
Clear scope; not a universal manifesto
Routable
Obvious what follow-up lane it enters
Non-Executing
Governance action, not operational dispatch
Presentation Format (Time-Boxed)
A) Priority
What changed, why now
B) Proposal
What should be done
C) Blocker
What's stuck
D) Ask
Support needed
E) Routing
Lane request
Common Decline Reasons
Transparency & Anti-Capture Principles
To prevent the public session from becoming centralized or sponsor-driven:
Rotating Spotlights
Spotlights rotate across regions and communities for diverse representation.
Equal Time-Boxing
All proposals time-boxed equally. No "announcement slots" or premium placement.
No Bypass
No one bypasses intake with email or influence. Standard process for all.
Full Recording
Even if not spotlighted, proposals are recorded and may be routed quietly.
What Submitters Can Expect
Upon Submission
- Confirmation that submission is received
- Clear status: accepted, acknowledged, reframing requested, or declined
- If spotlighted: preparation note on time-boxing and boundaries
After the Session
- Visibility in the public-safe recap
- Routing summary showing where proposal goes
- Action list with owner and next update window
Submit by Region
Select your region to submit a Community Proposal for the next monthly House Briefing.
Submission Template
Community Proposal Template
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Council and Board?
The Council is the consultative layer: gathering priorities, proposals, and blockers from stakeholder groups. It produces public syntheses and surfaces decision-grade items.
The Board is the decision layer: receiving routed items from Council, deliberating in closed session, and issuing institutional approvals or rejections.
What is a Priority Slate?
A Priority Slate is the standard monthly submission containing:
- Top 3 Priorities — What's materially changing
- Top 3 Proposals — What the forum should consider
- Top 3 Blockers — What's stuck and needs help
When are House Briefings held?
House Briefings are held on the second Tuesday of each month. This is the public gateway session where priorities are surfaced, proposals are discussed, and routing decisions are made.
How do I submit a proposal?
Submit proposals through the official portal at globalriskforum.com/proposals. All submissions must be public-safe and solution-forward.
What can't I do as a Council member?
Never execute, procure, or price on behalf of GRF. Never imply endorsement. Never disclose rosters. Never issue operational dispatch. Never represent GRF in negotiations without authorization.
Do I need to host any meetings?
No. GRF manages all convening logistics. Your role is to submit priorities, attend briefings, and follow through on assigned actions. Chairs coordinate front-of-house, but facilitation is handled by GRF staff.
Who can submit proposals—members only or public too?
Proposals can be submitted by anyone through the public portal. Members have priority visibility and can sponsor proposals for docket consideration. All submissions must meet public-safe criteria.
What happens if my proposal is not selected for spotlight?
All valid submissions are captured in the compilation. Not every item makes the spotlight shortlist, but all are recorded and can be routed to follow-up lanes or resubmitted in future cycles. The Chair explains routing decisions in the recap.
How do I join a committee or start a docket?
Committee invitations are extended based on expertise and interest expressed in your submissions. To propose a new docket, include a "docket request" in your Priority Slate with the issue, desired outputs, and timeline. The Chair will route viable requests to the appropriate lane.
What is "public-safe" vs "controlled"?
Public-safe outputs can be published without restriction—neutral summaries, routing decisions, and action lists. Controlled outputs are restricted to authorized participants and may contain sensitive details, draft positions, or pre-decisional material. Classification is determined by the Chair with CB review.
How are corrections issued and who can request them?
Any participant can request a correction to the record. Use the official correction script: "I need to correct a previous statement. [Correction]. The record should reflect this update." Corrections are logged with timestamps. No silent edits are permitted.
What does "member in good standing" mean in practice?
A member in good standing: (1) submits Priority Slates on time, (2) maintains integrity compliance (no boundary violations, COI disclosure), and (3) follows through on assigned actions within specified windows. Standing is reviewed quarterly and affects eligibility for committee roles and docket sponsorship.
Ready to Join?
Be part of the global conversation on risk governance. Contribute your expertise and shape coordinated responses.