Skip to content

GRF

Têgihiştin û çavkanî

What The Global Risks Forum (GRF) publishes under its own authority: governance papers, institutional analyses, explainers, approved speeches and lessons from dialogues, councils and annual cycles. Institutions face pressure to act on fast analysis. The UN Global Principles for Yekparebûna agahiyê (2024) ask publishers to show sources and corrections. Every GRF item carries its author, review state, sources and correction history. Nothing appears before release.

02Genres

Pênc cure û standardên ku her yek pêk tîne.

GenreArmancNirxandin
Governance paperAnalysis of a governance question with optionsExternal review by at least one independent reader
ExplainerPlain-language account of an instrument or processAccuracy check against the instrument’s text
Lêkolîna dozReconstruction of how institutions governed an eventFactual check by the institutions described
Learning noteLessons from dialogues and exercisesReview by the lesson owners
Speech or statementGRF’s own position on its own workAdopted by the responsible GRF organ
03Rewş

GRF does not take positions on other institutions’ decisions.

Insights explain and analyse; they do not lobby for an outcome in any negotiation or rate any government. Where a paper presents options, it says what evidence supports each and who would decide. Evidence comes from GCRI’s Reports with its labels.

04Publication standard

What every item is designed to state.

Nîşankirin

Who wrote it and for whom

Nivîskar, saziya weşangêr û her fînansker têne nav kirin. Sponsor nikarin weşanan pejirînin an delîlan biguherînin.

Delîl

What it rests on

Sources are cited, and data carries its evidence class: observed, modelled, scenario or expert judgement.

Rastkirin

Çi guherî û çima

A correction creates a recorded new version, never a silent edit.

05How insights are made

From convening to a publication someone can check.

  1. 01

    Tomar pêşî

    Most GRF analysis starts from records: dialogue outcomes, council minutes, exercise after-action notes. An insight cites the record it interprets.

  2. 02

    Method stated

    Comparative institutional analysis, case study, process tracing or scenario review, with the method named and its limits given.

  3. 03

    Rêya nirxandinê

    Each item states who reviewed it and how conflicts were managed; speeches are labelled as the speaker’s views unless released as an institutional statement.

  4. 04

    Bikaranîna din

    Findings may be offered to the Reports programme or, where a common method is missing, filed as a change proposal to the Nexus Standards. Neither body is bound by GRF’s analysis.

06Sînor

What a GRF publication is not.

  • It is not a regulatory interpretation, a rating, a ranking or a certification of any institution or country.
  • It is not investment, legal or financial advice; finance-readiness questions are led by The Global Risks Alliance (GRA).
  • A dialogue record states what participants agreed. An analysis states GRF’s view. The two are never presented as each other.
  • A scenario or exercise finding is never a forecast or a warning.

Hê tu weşana GRF di van berhevokan de nehatiye tomarkirin. Pirs diçin forma têkiliyê and corrections to the integrity concern form. GCRI’s research library is at weşanên GCRI.

07Di nirxandinê de

Tiştên pêşîn dê ji ku werin.

No GRF publication is listed in these collections yet. The Reports editions that GRF is scheduled to review for public meaning are drafts in stewardship review; each edition page states its evidence close, version and review passes. See the editions in review.

08Çavkanî

Where this page’s references lead.

Sazî û belgeyên ku ev rûpel li hember wan tê xwendin. Rewş û çap diguherin; her girêdan diçe ba saziya derxistinê.

10Pirs

Pirs û bersiv.

Why are there no papers listed yet?
Because an item is listed only once it has been released with its review state. A paper in preparation is not presented as published.
Can I cite a GRF speech as a GRF position?
Only where the speech is labelled as an institutional statement released by GRF. Otherwise a speech reflects the speaker’s views, and the label says so.
Ez çawa çewtiyekê rapor bikim?
Binivîse bo forma fikara yekparebûnê with the item and the claim. The acknowledgement gives a reference and names the next step, and any correction is recorded on Rastkirinên weşanê.
Where is the scientific evidence behind GRF analyses?
Evidence and methods are led by The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI). GRF analyses cite their sources and link to the publisher that holds the evidence.
ReportsTevkarî bike

Ji vê rûpelê delîl bidin.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

Global Risks Forum
The Global Risks Forum

Pirsek ya rêveberiyê bînin Forumê.

Agahî û pirs îro vekirî ne. Pirsek referansekê distîne û gava piştî wê dide nasîn; serlêdan, drav, veqetandina hesabkirinê û tomarkirin tenê dema ku tîm, mercên wê û kapasîteya vekolînê hebin vedibin.