GRF · PAGE · research-universitiesGRF dossier · service level R0
GRFLeadership and councils
Leadership · Research and universities

Research and universities constituency

Universities and research institutions take part in The Global Risks Forum (GRF) through the research and universities constituency council, one of five constituency councils through which institutions participate in the National Nexus Consortium (NNC). The council is designed to bring scholarship into institutional dialogue on shared risk while protecting what makes it valuable: independence. Research institutions contribute questions, methods, challenge and people. They keep full academic freedom, and no other participant, host or sponsor can shape their conclusions.

Institution
The Global Risks Forum (GRF)
Service level
R0: information and enquiries

Policy tracker

Research and universities constituency · Working tables · Session 2

6 items in consultationGRF · GRF

Items

Agenda01
Heat and workTable 2
Formulation01
Drought allocation principlesTable 1
Consultation02
Disclosure of nature riskTable 4
AI in public servicesTable 3
Recommendation01
Early warning mandatesCouncil

Items by region

GRF · Policy trackerPolicy tracker, in outline: domain structure with placeholder names and illustrative values, not a record.

01In brief

The short answer.

The research and universities constituency is the GRF council through which universities and research institutions take part in the National Nexus Consortium, bringing scholarship into institutional dialogue on shared risk. It is designed to protect scholarly independence, including the freedom to publish findings that participants dislike.

02Geography

Jurisdictions in the Andes.

The jurisdictions that hold authority over this question: countries, their first-level divisions and capitals, shown for the Andes as an example geography for this subject.

The jurisdictions that hold authority over this question: countries, their first-level divisions and capitals.Boundaries as drawn by Natural Earth; no position on disputed areas.
GRF · institution · fieldDESIGN FIGURE
03What the constituency brings

Scholarship in the room where institutions decide.

Questions

Research questions

Framing what institutions do not yet know about a shared risk, and which questions are worth testing.

Methods

Methods and challenge

Scrutiny of evidence and options in dialogues, with the uncertainty and limits stated plainly.

People

Researchers and students

Researchers in dialogues and working groups, and students in supervised, bounded assignments through the National Working Groups (NWG).

04Science-policy interface

What universities bring, and what they need protected.

ContributionProtection needed
Independent analysis of governance questionsFreedom to publish findings unwelcome to participants
Students and early-career researchers in dialogues and exercisesSupervision and credit for their work
Long-term data and case archivesLicences and data protection respected
Teaching material from real casesConsent of institutions described

Academic freedom principles, such as those in the UNESCO Recommendation concerning the Status of Higher-Education Teaching Personnel, apply in GRF settings.

05Routes

Where research institutions plug in.

Research questions with a governance angle sit on Research Nexus; science-based evidence work with GCRI; financial research with GRA research.

06Independence

Safeguards for scholarly independence.

  • The institution keeps full control of its research agenda, publications and conclusions.
  • Participation is not endorsement: a university's presence in a dialogue does not mean it endorses the record or any policy option.
  • Scientific and editorial acceptance stays with qualified, conflict-managed reviewers and the publisher; institutional influence cannot decide a conclusion.
  • Scientific publication authority in the programme sits with The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), not with GRF.
  • Interests, including funding sources relevant to a matter, are declared, and a conflicted researcher does not decide or sign the matter it concerns.
  • Data contributed under agreed rights stays under those rights; nothing is shared without agreement.
07How a research institution takes part

From enquiry to contribution plan.

  1. 01

    Institutional enquiry

    The institution writes to the Secretariat and receives a reference.

  2. 02

    Authority check

    Its identity, mandate and the authority of its representatives are confirmed, and interests are declared.

  3. 03

    Contribution plan

    What it brings: representatives, research capability, supervised student work or data under agreed rights.

  4. 04

    Written terms

    Terms with the correct parties and scope. Ordinary working-group participation carries no fee, and no fee amount is published until a schedule is adopted.

Institutional membership does not create a Leadership Council seat for any staff member. Individual leaders follow the separate nominations and selection procedure.

08Connected work

Where research meets the network.

Research dialogue at GRF is carried by Research Nexus, which works on institutional research dialogue and evidence interpretation without taking over GCRI's scientific publication role. GCRI's route for universities and researchers covers research partnerships, methods and publication. Other constituencies are state and government, industry and standards, media and civil society and communities and Indigenous institutions., all described on Leadership and councils.

09Key terms

Terms used on this page.

Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.

TermDefinition
ConstituencyA group of institutions or people with a shared stake, such as governments, research, industry, media or Indigenous communities, represented in a council so that its perspective is heard.
Research integrityConduct of research in line with principles of reliability, honesty, respect and accountability, as the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity sets them out.
Science-policy interfaceThe arrangements through which scientific evidence reaches public decisions, including advisory committees, chief scientific advisers, academies and intergovernmental assessments.
10Sources

Where this page's references lead.

The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.

11Questions

Questions and answers.

Is the research and universities council open now?
Not yet. The current service level is R0, information and enquiries. Institutions can write to the Secretariat at contact@therisk.global and receive a reference; applications open when terms and review capacity are in place.
Can a sponsor or host influence our findings?
No. Sponsors cannot approve publications or change evidence, and hosting confers no authority over results. Your institution's conclusions remain its own.
Can students take part?
Yes, through the working groups, in bounded assignments with a named supervisor and stated prerequisites. No student or volunteer receives an unsupervised high-consequence assignment.
Does GRF publish our research?
Not as a matter of course. Your institution publishes its own work. Programme publications in Nexus Reports are governed by GCRI's editorial and scientific review.
The Global Risks Forum

Start with an enquiry.

The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.