Detecting coordinated behaviour
Accounts that post the same content at the same times or share links in synchronised patterns are identified, with thresholds and false positive checks stated.
GRF · Information Integrity and Public Trust
Network science studies how connections between accounts, outlets and communities shape the spread of information. In information integrity it identifies coordinated behaviour, maps how narratives travel and shows where interventions on networks would change reach.
Network science and contagion study how the structure of connections among entities shapes the spread of failures, information and disease. It provides tools to analyse interdependent infrastructure, supply chains and financial systems. In information and public trust and society and human development, network science identifies critical nodes and pathways through which shocks propagate across sectors. It informs targeted protection and diversification to limit cascades. The canonical description is on the STEM Commons.
Accounts that post the same content at the same times or share links in synchronised patterns are identified, with thresholds and false positive checks stated.
Diffusion cascades show how a claim moved between communities and platforms, identifying the accounts and outlets that bridged them.
Hyperlink and citation networks between outlets show clusters and isolated communities in a country's media system.
Population density, night lights and land cover over Eastern Europe, from NASA GIBS. Each layer carries its own date.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 3
People and exposure, for this page
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
People and exposure, framed on Eastern Europe.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date. They are indicators, not assessments of any place.
Layers and dates
Datasets and records used by network science and contagion on this platform, with the role each plays and the label its values carry. Sources are listed in the source register.
| Data | Role | Label |
|---|---|---|
| Platform research APIs and data access | Network data | OBSERVED |
| Hyperlink and citation data | Outlet networks | OBSERVED |
| Platform takedown datasets | Known coordinated networks | REPORTED |
| Fact-check databases | Labelled claims | REPORTED |
How leverage limits, exposure caps and recovery arrangements change how far a shock spreads through the banking system, the levers supervisors and central banks hold. Teaching model with stated illustrative values, not a prediction. The map on this page shows Eastern Europe; the model itself is not tied to a place.
Controls
Readouts
| Round | System equity lost (%) | Banks in default |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 18.00 | 0 |
| 1 | 28.80 | 0 |
| 2 | 35.28 | 0 |
| 3 | 39.17 | 0 |
| 4 | 41.50 | 0 |
| 5 | 42.90 | 0 |
| 6 | 43.74 | 0 |
| 7 | 44.24 | 0 |
| 8 | 44.55 | 0 |
| 9 | 44.73 | 0 |
| 10 | 44.84 | 0 |
| 11 | 44.90 | 0 |
| 12 | 44.94 | 0 |
| 13 | 44.96 | 0 |
| 14 | 44.98 | 0 |
| 15 | 44.99 | 0 |
| 16 | 44.99 | 0 |
| 17 | 45.00 | 0 |
| 18 | 45.00 | 0 |
| 19 | 45.00 | 0 |
| 20 | 45.00 | 0 |
| 21 | 45.00 | 0 |
| 22 | 45.00 | 0 |
| 23 | 45.00 | 0 |
| 24 | 45.00 | 0 |
| 25 | 45.00 | 0 |
| 26 | 45.00 | 0 |
| 27 | 45.00 | 0 |
| 28 | 45.00 | 0 |
| 29 | 45.00 | 0 |
| 30 | 45.00 | 0 |
No observed data enters this model: it runs on the teaching values set by the controls, to be replaced with a programme's own evidence.
Across the six pillars, led by Nexus Consortium
Models are checked by reproducing observed cascades and outbreaks. Robustness of results to missing or uncertain links is tested.
| Check | How it is done |
|---|---|
| Coordination is not causation | Coordinated patterns are distinguished from organic convergence on a topic |
| Data access bias | The platform and period covered by the data are stated |
| Robustness | Network findings are tested across thresholds and samples |
Network data are often incomplete or confidential. Static network models may miss adaptive behaviour during cascades.
Assembled from the Nexus Standards area profile Information integrity and trust: the hazards it names, the systems and communities that carry the loss, the controls and institutions that dampen it and the data that observe it. Pick an initiating event and step through the cascade to see where mandates meet and which decisions fall to whom. The Map view places the run on an example geography with open data. Every weight is a stated assumption. An exercise for dialogue, not a forecast, an assessment or a position. To model a place of your own choosing, open the full System Builder.
Hazards
Systems and couplings
Controls
NS-0 Constitution and principlesNS-2 Citation and attribution format for UNIsNS-9 Contextual UNIs (deployments, instances, programme instances)NS-11 Verification and monitoring (evidence, attestations, zero-trust conformance observation)NS-12 Software, model and AI/ML artefacts (supply chain, model cards, dataset sheets)NRS-H52 Hazard family: Information-integrity attacks (NHS-1 cyber.integrity)NRS-X7 Information integrity and public trustNRS-U23 Universe platform profile: ReportsNRS-A4 Zero-trust verification of standards and conformanceNRS-H65 Hazard family: Planetary boundary transgressions (NHS-1 planet.boundary)NRS-H72 Hazard family: Novel entities and emerging contaminants (NHS-1 poll.novel-entities)Observation
Example geography
The instruments, mandates, actors and accountability arrangements a policymaker, diplomat or development agency works with, citing the agreements that set them. Structures follow the frameworks named. Any state or progress drawn is illustrative, not a record.
How commitments on network science and contagion for information integrity and public trust are held to account, from commitment to correction.
Systems Science and Modelling stewards network science and contagion for the Consortium and reviews how it is applied across platforms.
Reports is the Consortium's quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
Never send personal data, sensitive infrastructure detail or anything you have no right to share. A contribution is reviewed before use; sending it confers no authorship or editorial rights, and sponsorship never buys a finding.
Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.
Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.
This site uses only strictly necessary cookies to work and to remember your privacy choices. Nothing loads from other companies, and we never sell or share your personal information.
This site uses only strictly necessary cookies to work and to remember your privacy choices. Nothing loads from other companies, and we never sell or share your personal information. We run no advertising. You can review your choices at any time through Privacy choices at the foot of every page.