Information Integrity and Public Trust
The Global Risks Forum (GRF)
Local news reports on councils, courts, schools and emergencies that national outlets ignore. Where local reporting has closed, fewer people vote in local elections, borrowing costs for municipalities can rise and rumours fill the gap. Community media and trusted local messengers carry information where commercial news does not reach. This page sets out how community information systems work and fail, the records that show it, and who decides.
GRF · In development · service level R0
Community information is the local news, community media and trusted messengers through which people learn about their councils, courts, schools and emergencies. Where local reporting closes, accountability weakens and rumours fill gaps. Legislatures, regulators, funders and local governments hold the decisions.
For community information, in GRF's situational-awareness reading, the map opens on population density and night lights with place names and borders from NASA GIBS, framed on Eastern Europe; 4 further NASA layers wait in the list.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 2
People and exposure, for this page
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
For community information, in GRF's situational-awareness reading, the map opens on population density and night lights with place names and borders from NASA GIBS, framed on Eastern Europe; 4 further NASA layers wait in the list.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place; claim ceiling INTEGRATED.
Layers and dates
Access and local language needs. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Loss of classified and display advertising made many local papers unviable. Closures leave places without regular reporting on local institutions.
Without reporters at council meetings and courts, misconduct is less likely to be found. Research links closures to changes in local government and civic behaviour.
Community radio, non-profit newsrooms and local social groups provide information, with varying resources, standards and reach.
Local leaders, health workers and faith groups carry information further than distant institutions. Their reach depends on being informed and involved.
Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| News desert | A community with very limited access to credible and comprehensive local news. |
| Community radio | Radio owned and run by a community for its benefit, usually non-profit. |
| Trusted messenger | A person or organization whose information a community believes, such as a local health worker or leader. |
Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.
| Indicator | Unit | Cadence | Source type | Label |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Areas without a local news source | count of local areas | annual | News desert mapping | ESTIMATED |
| Local news outlets closed and opened | count | annual | Industry and academic tracking | REPORTED |
| Licensed community radio stations | count | annual | Broadcast regulator registers | OFFICIAL |
| Public funding for local journalism | currency per year | annual | Government budgets | OFFICIAL |
| Local election turnout | share of eligible voters | per election | Electoral records | OFFICIAL |
| Trust in local news | share of respondents | annual | Digital News Report | ESTIMATED |
The topic as a computational graph: named sources feed the methods, an evidence review gates the outputs, and the decisions stay with the authorities that hold them.
Fig. 02Nodes carry their type, two metric rows and a state; connectors show what feeds what; dashed frames name the owners; the timeline is the cadence. Design of the pipeline, not a record of a run.
Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.
| Source | What it gives | Licence class |
|---|---|---|
| Medill State of Local News report | Mapping of news deserts in the United States | Free to read, terms to check |
| Broadcast regulator registers | Licensed community stations | Public records, terms per regulator |
| UNESCO World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development | Global trends in media viability and freedom | Free, UNESCO terms |
| Reuters Institute Digital News Report | Local news use and trust | Free to read, terms to check |
| Electoral commission records | Local election turnout | Public records, terms per commission |
Information Integrity and Public Trust prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| Who decides | The question | Evidence this page serves |
|---|---|---|
| Legislatures and culture ministries | Whether and how to support local journalism | Comparative support schemes and safeguards for independence |
| Broadcast regulators | How community media are licensed and supported | Licensing frameworks and evidence |
| Philanthropic funders | Which local news models to fund | Evidence on sustainability and reach |
| Local governments | How to publish information and engage residents | Open government practice and local evidence |
Researchers on community information ask who is left out and how to reach them.
Public information is often produced in official languages, in written form and through digital channels, which excludes speakers of minority languages, people with low literacy, older people without internet access and many people with disabilities. Migrants and displaced people may distrust official sources or lack the networks through which information travels.
Communities develop their own information networks through local leaders, religious organizations, community radio and messaging groups. These networks can be faster and more trusted than official channels but can also spread rumours. Effective approaches tend to involve communities in designing information, use multiple formats and languages, and work through trusted intermediaries.
Asking communities what information they need and how they receive it, with social and behavioural science. Assessments must reach those hardest to reach.
Evaluating information against accessibility standards. Standards alone do not ensure comprehension.
Understanding local information practices. Time-intensive and context-specific.
Mapping community information flows with network science. Requires consent and trust.
The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.