Skip to content

GRF · 气候与自然治理

气候正义与公平

Climate and nature risks fall unevenly. People with least income, secure tenure or political voice often face more exposure and have fewer means to recover, and they have little say in the decisions that shape their risk. Climate justice concerns who bears the risk, who decides and who is compensated. This page sets out the mechanisms that produce unequal outcomes, the records that show them, and the institutions that hold the decisions.

01登记

Climate justice and equity on the record.

02问题

Climate justice and equity: how the risk develops.

Differential exposure and access. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

机制

Exposure follows disadvantage

Informal settlements on floodplains, outdoor work in heat and dependence on rain-fed farming concentrate hazard on lower-income groups. Their losses are a larger share of their assets and often go uninsured and unrecorded.

机制

Procedure decides voice

Rights to information, participation and access to justice decide who can shape and challenge decisions. Where these rights are weak or defenders are threatened, decisions reflect those already heard.

机制

Finance flows to capacity

Climate finance tends to reach institutions able to prepare proposals and meet fiduciary standards. Communities and local governments with the greatest need may have the least access.

机制

Responses can deepen inequity

Relocation, conservation enclosures and carbon projects can displace people or restrict their use of land. Without consent and benefit-sharing, measures meant to reduce risk shift costs to those with least power.

03地理

安第斯地区的气候信号。

Population density, daytime surface heat and rain over the Andes, from NASA GIBS. Each layer carries its own date.

交互式地图需要JavaScript;图层列表和来源见下文。

图层 3

本页的气候信号

关于此图层
证据
估计值
来源
世界网格化人口 v4.11(NASA SEDAC(哥伦比亚大学 CIESIN))
提供方
NASA SEDAC(CIESIN,哥伦比亚大学)
许可协议
CC BY 4.0
年份版本
null;基于人口普查的估算,静态(2020)
分辨率
约 1 公里网格
不确定性
基于普查的 2020 年每平方公里人口估算,作为风险暴露背景展示;不是受任何危害影响的人口数。
可通过以下方式到达
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov,仅在您允许加载实时地图后访问
关于此图层
证据
观测(持续云层仍会造成缺口)
来源
VIIRS NOAA-20 3 级产品,8 日(NASA LANCE)
提供方
NASA LANCE
许可协议
NASA 开放数据
年份版本
8 日;卫星 8 日合成;持续云层仍会造成缺口
构建时的最新内容
2026-09-14
分辨率
约 1 公里网格
不确定性
截至所示日期的 8 天内地表的卫星表面温度,是一项热风险暴露指标;不是气温、热指数或高温预警。
可通过以下方式到达
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov,仅在您允许加载实时地图后访问
关于此图层
证据
估计值
来源
GPM IMERG(NASA GES DISC)
提供方
NASA GES DISC
许可协议
NASA 开放数据
年份版本
每日;近实时卫星估算
构建时的最新内容
2026-10-12
分辨率
约 2 公里网格
不确定性
近实时卫星估算。卫星或模型栅格数据,按提供方发布的原样呈现。云层、条带缺口和反演误差会造成缺口和噪声;数值是指标,而非某地的测量值。
可通过以下方式到达
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov,仅在您允许加载实时地图后访问
关于此图层
证据
观测(云层造成缺口)
来源
VIIRS 全球洪水产品(NASA LANCE)
提供方
NASA LANCE
许可协议
NASA 开放数据
年份版本
每日;卫星探测;云层造成缺口
构建时的最新内容
2026-10-14
分辨率
约 250 米网格
不确定性
卫星探测;云层造成缺口。按提供方发布的原样提供的卫星或模型栅格数据。云层、扫描带缺口和反演误差会造成缺口和噪声;这些数值是指标,不是某一地点的测量值。
可通过以下方式到达
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov,仅在您允许加载实时地图后访问
关于此图层
证据
观测
来源
GHRSST MUR25(NASA JPL PO.DAAC)
提供方
NASA JPL PO.DAAC
许可协议
NASA 开放数据
年份版本
每日;卫星分析
构建时的最新内容
2026-10-12
分辨率
约 2 公里网格
不确定性
对所示日期海温偏离常年值幅度的卫星分析;是海洋热浪指标,并非 珊瑚白化 警报。
可通过以下方式到达
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov,仅在您允许加载实时地图后访问
关于此图层
证据
观测
来源
VIIRS 黑色大理石(VNP46A2)(NASA LAADS DAAC)
提供方
NASA LAADS DAAC
许可协议
NASA 开放数据
年份版本
每日;卫星辐亮度,已校正月光和大气影响
构建时的最新内容
2026-10-12
分辨率
约 500 米网格
不确定性
所示日期的卫星夜间辐亮度;灯光是用电和停电情况的代理指标,不是对供应或可及性的测量。
可通过以下方式到达
gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov,仅在您允许加载实时地图后访问

最新可用

NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap贡献者 (ODbL) · Natural Earth

正在加载最新的NASA影像。

拖动以移动。按住 Ctrl 或 ⌘ 并滚动、双指缩放或使用按钮缩放;悬停可查看指针下的数值;重置可返回该区域。

安第斯地区的气候信号。NASA 发布的卫星和模型产品,各带自己的日期。它们是指标,而非对任何地点的评估。

数据:NASA GIBS · ASTER GDEM · Blue Marble · © OpenStreetMap 贡献者 · Natural Earth · NASA EONET · NASA AIRS · 美国地质调查局来源与许可

  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA 开放数据
  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA 开放数据
  • Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University. 2018. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density, Revision 11. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). 采用 CC BY 4.0 许可。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘;显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均(经修改)。 doi:10.7927/H49C6VHW. CC BY 4.0
  • VIIRS 近实时产品(洪水、地表温度、积雪覆盖、校正反射率),NASA LANCE;影像来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘;显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均(经修改)。 NASA 开放数据
  • GPM IMERG 降水,NASA 降水处理系统;由 NASA 戈达德地球科学数据和信息服务中心(GES DISC)分发;影像来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘;显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均(经修改)。 NASA 开放数据
  • GHRSST Level 4 MUR 分析,NASA 喷气推进实验室;由 NASA 物理海洋学 DAAC(PO.DAAC)分发;影像来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘;显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均(经修改)。 NASA 开放数据
  • VIIRS Black Marble 夜间灯光,NASA 戈达德航天中心;由 NASA Level-1 与大气档案和分发系统(LAADS DAAC)分发;影像来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘;显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均(经修改)。 NASA 开放数据
  • ASTER GDEM 是 METI 和 NASA 的产品(ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003,NASA LP DAAC);影像来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘;显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均(经修改)。引用格式:NASA/METI/AIST/Japan Spacesystems and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team (2019). ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003. doi:10.5067/ASTER/ASTGTM.003. NASA 开放数据
  • 使用 Natural Earth 制作。免费矢量和栅格地图数据,见 naturalearthdata.com。 公有领域
  • © OpenStreetMap 贡献者(ODbL),经由 NASA GIBS(海岸线、边界、道路和地名)。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘;显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均(经修改)。 ODbL
  • Blue Marble,NASA Earth Observatory;影像来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘;显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均(经修改)。 NASA 开放数据
  • 地球仪和平面地图上的背景信息:海岸线、边界、道路和地名来自 NASA GIBS 参考图层(OpenStreetMap 数据,ODbL,© OpenStreetMap contributors);Blue Marble 影像可作为可选底图;3D 地形和高程读数来自 ASTER GDEM 高程色彩指数(5 m 至 200 m 分级,为便于辨识而作了夸张处理)。边界按已发布的样式绘制,不代表对任何领土的立场。
  • 实时事件:NASA Earth Observatory Natural Event Tracker(EONET);事件仅供参考,并保留其原始来源链接。
  • 实时:NASA EONET。事件仅供参考,不是主管机构的预警。
  • Observed (EO): NASA AIRS. We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • 实时:美国地质调查局。事件仅供参考,不是主管机构的预警。
  • NASA GIBS: We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • 空气质量预报,5 天,PM2.5(CAMS,经由 Open-Meteo):包含经修改的 Copernicus 大气监测服务 2026 年信息。
  • 过去一年的每日气温(ERA5,经由 Open-Meteo):包含经修改的 Copernicus 气候变化服务 2026 年信息。
  • 过去一年的每日气温和日照(NASA POWER):这些数据来自 NASA 兰利研究中心(LaRC)POWER 项目,该项目由 NASA 地球科学/应用科学计划资助。
  • 天气数据来自 Open-Meteo.com (https://open-meteo.com/), 依据 CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 授权。
  • Optional layers (22 sources in the layer list: live, forecast, observed and context) print their provider credit on the map and here when switched on; forecasts are model output and derived indices are estimates.

图层与日期

  • 人口密度,2020 年:人口:哥伦比亚大学 CIESIN,世界网格化人口 v4.11(2018),NASA SEDAC, CC BY 4.0 · 静态
  • 地表温度,日间,8 天合成:VIIRS NOAA-20 3 级产品,8 天,NASA LANCE · 2026年9月14日
  • 降水率,日均值:GPM IMERG,NASA GES DISC · 2026年10月12日
  • 洪水水体,3 日合成:VIIRS 全球洪水产品,NASA LANCE · 2026年10月14日
  • 海面温度距平:GHRSST MUR25,NASA JPL PO.DAAC · 2026年10月12日
  • 夜间灯光,每日:VIIRS Black Marble(VNP46A2),NASA LAADS DAAC · 2026年10月12日

04指标

衡量什么,以及衡量得如何。

每个指标都注明其单位、频率、背后的来源类型以及数值将附带的证据标签。此处不显示数值:数值由计划依据其自身权限提供。

指标单位节奏来源类型标签
Population exposed to hazard by income grouppersons, by quintile定期Hazard maps against household surveys模型估算
Disaster losses by income levelcurrency and share of household assets每个事件Post-disaster needs assessments估算
Ratification of Aarhus or Escazú agreements是或否变更时Treaty depositary records已发布统计
Recorded killings of land and environmental defenders每年计数年度Civil society monitoring已报告
Climate finance reaching the local levelshare of committed finance, percent年度Fund and project records估算
损失与损害 fund requests and approvalscount and currency年度Fund records已发布统计
05监测

适应计划跟踪器。

团队跟踪该主题时会使用的界面:其指标、状态与决策。名称为示例,数值仅作示意。

适应计划追踪器

Climate justice and equity · National adaptation council · Plan year 4

水务部门进度滞后GRF · 气候与自然治理

按部门划分的进展正常的行动

水,%31 of 70 required农业,%49 of 70 required卫生,%83 of 70 required城市,%61 of 70 required

落实差距

无干旱分配规则水授权不明流域委员会
缺少高温计划卫生资金主管部委
海岸退缩线未执行城市能力D 省

适应循环

  1. 评估风险国家
  2. 计划NAP
  3. 实施部门
  4. 监测指标
  5. 评估学习
Adaptation plan tracker: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Climate justice and equity.示例名称和示意数值;是设计方案,并非记录或实时系统。
06来源

证据来自何处。

具名公共数据集与机构记录,各自注明许可类别。依协议获得的来源仅按其条款使用,绝不再次发布。

来源它提供什么许可类别
IPCC 第六次评估报告第二工作组Assessment of vulnerability, equity and climate justice免费,IPCC 条款
World Bank poverty and inequality dataHousehold income and poverty measures by countryCC BY 4.0
Global Witness land and environmental defenders dataDocumented killings of defenders by country免费阅读,条款待核实
UN treaty depositary recordsStatus of Aarhus, Escazú and related agreementsPublic records, UN terms
Post-disaster needs assessments (PDNA)Damage, loss and recovery needs, sometimes disaggregatedPublic reports, terms per publisher
Fund for responding to Loss and Damage recordsGoverning decisions and funding approvals公共记录,条款待核实
07政策情景

比较文书:规则、激励和信息。

三类工具在你设定的覆盖率和遵从率下与基线并列比较,每类都有自己的滞后和采用速度;效应大小是教学用数值,应以证据替换。情景:关于未来的具名假设,不是预测。本页地图显示安第斯山脉;模型本身并不绑定某个地点。

控制措施

结果的基线趋势
每年 2.0%
该工具的覆盖范围
70%
合规
75%
效应量,相对于教学取值
100%
未来年数
20 年

读数

期末时点降幅最大
监管
相对基线的降幅
21%
数字、方法与来源
年份基线监管经济激励信息与能力
0100.099.598.899.1
1102.0101.2100.199.8
2104.0102.5101.199.9
3106.1103.5101.6100.0
4108.2103.7101.8100.7
5110.4103.2101.7102.1
6112.6102.0101.6103.9
7114.9100.4101.6105.9
8117.299.2102.1108.0
9119.598.6102.9110.1
10121.998.9104.2112.3
11124.399.7105.7114.5
12126.8101.1107.4116.8
13129.4102.7109.4119.2
14131.9104.5111.4121.6
15134.6106.5113.5124.0
16137.3108.5115.7126.5
17140.0110.7118.0129.0
18142.8112.9120.4131.6
19145.7115.1122.8134.2
20148.6117.4125.2136.9

方法

  1. 政府工具 Hood (1983), The Tools of Government, Macmillan
  2. 胡萝卜、大棒与说教 Bemelmans-Videc, Rist and Vedung (1998), Transaction
  3. 创新扩散 Rogers (2003), Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press
  4. 不确定性扇形图(参数蒙特卡罗) Spiegelhalter, Pearson and Short (2011), Visualising uncertainty about the future, Science 333
  5. 单因素敏感性(龙卷风图) Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley

数据

The model runs on the teaching values set by the controls. To calibrate it for a place, read it against these admitted layers and series, which this page’s map can draw:

  • 边界 Natural Earth
  • 城市 Natural Earth
比较政策工具:规则、激励和信息。示意性教学模型:依据控件设定的数值运行,而非实测数据。方法:政府工具(Hood (1983), The Tools of Government, Macmillan);胡萝卜、大棒与说教(Bemelmans-Videc, Rist and Vedung (1998), Transaction);创新扩散(Rogers (2003), Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press)。
08决定

由谁决定,以及证据服务于什么。

气候与自然治理负责准备证据。以下决定由所列主管机构依据其自身规则作出,绝不由平台作出。

谁来决定问题本页面服务的证据
国家政府How climate and nature measures are designed to share costs and benefits fairlyDisaggregated exposure and loss evidence and comparable policy designs
Climate fund boardsHow access modalities reach local and vulnerable groupsRecords of who receives finance and through which channels
Courts and human rights bodiesWhether rights are affected by climate action or inactionRecords and assessments presented by parties; the page serves context only
Local authoritiesHow communities take part in planning and relocation decisionsParticipation practice and lessons from comparable cases

该主题产生的产出

  • Dialogue briefs on procedural rights and participation in climate decisions
  • Guide to disaggregating exposure and loss by income, gender and tenure
  • Comparative notes on 损失与损害 funding arrangements
  • Questions for decision makers on distributional effects of climate measures
09实施

从授权到评估,按支柱划分。

一项文书从授权到评估所经历的步骤,每一步都标明负责运行的支柱,以及仍由当局作出的决定。这是带有明示说明性数值的教学模型,不是预测。本页地图显示的是安第斯山脉;模型本身不限于某一地点。

  1. 授权与问题界定 主管当局(计划之外)
    主管当局依其自身规则界定问题和授权。 Howlett、Ramesh 和 Perl(2009)
  2. 证据与系统模型 Foundry
    对系统及其反馈、数据和已说明的局限进行建模。 OECD (2014),原则 2
  3. 在情景下评估备选方案 Foundry
    在情景下比较各项政策工具,并显示不确定性。 Hood (1983)
  4. 与利益相关方演练 宇宙
    在演练中与将实施和承担这些方案的各方一起检验方案。 OECD(2014),原则 3
  5. 起草标准或指南 Nexus Standards
    行之有效的做法被编纂为标准或指南,并公开征求意见。 Nexus Standards 流程
  6. 由主管当局决定 主管当局(计划之外)
    主管当局在计划之外,依据记录在案的证据作出决定。 Howlett、Ramesh 和 Perl(2009)
  7. 能力与培训 Risk Academy
    负责实施的人员接受关于所决定文书及其数据的培训。 仙台框架(2015),优先事项 2
  8. 监测与公开报告 报告
    指标连同来源、局限和更正一并发布。 OECD(2014),原则 5
  9. 评估与修订 Nexus Standards
    结果反馈至标准和模型:循环闭合。 Howlett、Ramesh 和 Perl(2009)

方法

  1. 政策周期 Howlett, Ramesh and Perl (2009), Studying Public Policy, Oxford University Press
  2. 关键风险治理 OECD(2014),Recommendation of the Council on the Governance of Critical Risks
  3. 有向图的分层绘制 Sugiyama, Tagawa and Toda (1981), IEEE SMC 11
从授权到评估,按支柱划分:所记录的各个步骤及其所属支柱;来源按各步骤所引。
10核心问题

What researchers ask about justice and equity.

  • Who is most exposed and vulnerable to climate impacts, and why?
  • Who has access to adaptation resources, information and decision-making?
  • How are the costs and benefits of climate policies distributed?
  • How are historical responsibility and capability reflected in governance?
11孪生与级联模拟器

Exercise a cascade in climate justice and equity with the people who decide.

Assembled from the Nexus Standards area profile 气候适应与转型风险: the hazards it names, the 系统 and communities that carry the loss, the controls and institutions that dampen it and the data that observe it. Pick an initiating event and step through the cascade to see where mandates meet and which decisions fall to whom. The Map view places the run on an example geography with open data. Every weight is a stated assumption. An exercise for dialogue, not a forecast, an assessment or a position. To model a place of your own choosing, open the full System Builder.

灾害

  • 海平面上升
  • 热浪
  • 风暴
  • 山洪
  • 气象干旱
  • 地下水枯竭
  • 大范围停电(在下游引发)
  • 大规模森林干扰(在下游引发)
  • 野火 (在下游引发)
  • 极端火险天气(在下游引发)
  • 高温导致的电网压力(在下游引发)
  • 农业干旱(在下游引发)
  • 骤发干旱(在下游引发)
  • 积雪干旱(在下游引发)
  • 近地面臭氧事件(在下游引发)
  • 泥石流(在下游引发)
  • 水文干旱(在下游引发)
  • 泥炭与地下火(在下游引发)

控制措施

  • NS-0 章程与原则
  • NS-3 风险记录 UNI(语法、旧编码对照、分配机构)
  • NS-9 情境 UNI(部署、实例、计划实例)
  • NS-10 政策和条款(机器可读的义务:定义、约束、评估和执行)
  • NS-11 验证与监测(证据、证明、零信任符合性观测)
  • NS-14 符合性及与外部标准的对照
  • NRS-X1 气候变化风险与适应
  • NRS-T16 人工智能代理与自主决策系统风险
  • NRS-H65 危害类别:超越行星边界(NHS-1 planet.boundary)
  • NRS-I7 智能应用:有依据的检索、推理与决策支持
  • NRS-K20 领域包规范:气候适应(DOMAIN-020)
  • NRS-K21 领域包配置文件:气候减缓碳(DOMAIN-021)

观测

  • CMIP6 气候预估(Copernicus Climate Data Store)(仅列作参考)
  • NGFS Scenario Explorer(仅列作参考)
  • ERA5 再分析(Copernicus Climate Data Store)(仅列作参考)
  • World Bank Open Data 和 World Development Indicators API(仅列作参考)
  • 已制定国家自主贡献、长期战略、国家适应计划和适应信息通报的国家数目
  • 根据 仙台框架

示例地理范围

  • 太平洋岛国:150 个六边形网格
  • 今夜夜间灯光与停电(VIIRS 昼夜波段),NASA GIBS
  • 白天地表气温(AIRS),NASA GIBS
  • 过去半小时降雨率(IMERG),NASA GIBS
  • 穿透云层的地表水,30 m(OPERA DSWx-S1 雷达),NASA GIBS
12机制

How inequality shapes climate risk.

Vulnerability is shaped by poverty, housing, health, gender, age, disability, ethnicity and access to services. Informal settlements on floodplains, outdoor workers in heat and smallholders dependent on rainfall face higher risk with fewer resources. Within countries, adaptation investment can flow to places with more political voice rather than greater need.

Climate justice has distributive, procedural and recognition dimensions: who gets what, who decides and whose knowledge and identity are respected. Policies such as carbon pricing or conservation restrictions can impose costs on poorer groups unless designed with compensation and participation. Between countries, debates centre on responsibility, finance and 损失与损害.

Why now: the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion on states’ climate obligations (2025) and the operation of the fund for responding to loss and damage have put questions of fairness into legal and budget decisions. The platform is designed to make sure the people most exposed are heard in dialogue, and to record whose interests were not represented.

13工具与承诺

How climate justice and equity is governed: instruments, mandates and commitments.

政策制定者、外交官或发展机构所使用的文书、授权、行为方和问责安排,并注明设定它们的协定。结构遵循所列框架。所绘制的任何状态或进展均为说明性,并非记录。

发展成果

The Sustainable Development Goals and targets that outcomes on climate justice and equity are reported against.

目标目标时限该主题如何关联
目标 13,气候行动具体目标 13.1,韧性与适应能力通过该具体目标的商定指标报告的成果
目标 15,陆地生物具体目标 15.5,遏制生物多样性丧失通过该具体目标的商定指标报告的成果
目标 6,清洁饮水和卫生设施具体目标 6.5,水资源综合管理通过该具体目标的商定指标报告的成果
目标 2,零饥饿具体目标 2.4,可持续且有韧性的粮食生产通过该具体目标的商定指标报告的成果
目标 16,和平、正义与强大机构具体目标 16.6,有效、负责和透明的机构通过该具体目标的商定指标报告的成果
Goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda, chosen from the page’s fields; indicators are reported by countries, not by the Forum.
《仙台框架》(减少灾害风险) · 联合国减少灾害风险办公室《巴黎协定》 · 《联合国气候变化框架公约》《2030 年可持续发展议程》和可持续发展目标 · 联合国《国际卫生条例》 · 世卫组织
14方法与证据

How equity is assessed.

  1. 01

    Vulnerability assessment

    Combining social and hazard data to identify who is at risk, informed by 气候与大气科学. Indices simplify and can hide variation.

  2. 02

    分配分析

    Assessing who bears policy costs and benefits. Results depend on assumptions.

  3. 03

    Participatory methods

    Involving affected communities in assessment and decision, using 政策、制度与决策科学. Participation can be tokenistic if not linked to decisions.

  4. 04

    Institutional review

    Examining how equity is built into mandates and procedures.

15方法

如何研究,以及方法无法说明的内容。

  1. 政策、制度与决策科学职责授权与决策权梳理 · 承诺的过程追踪在此应用
  2. 气候与大气科学适应计划的情景 · 治理辩论中的归因在此应用
  3. 农业、土壤与食品科学灌溉与作物选择 · 干旱对产量的影响 · 小农适应选项在此应用
16问题

问题与解答。

What is climate justice?
An approach that links climate action to equity and rights: how risks and responsibilities are shared, who takes part in decisions and how harm is remedied. The IPCC distinguishes distributive, procedural and recognitional justice.
What is loss and damage?
Harm from climate change that adaptation has not prevented. Parties to the UNFCCC established funding arrangements, including a fund, to respond to it in vulnerable developing countries.
What are procedural environmental rights?
Rights of access to information, participation in decisions and access to justice in environmental matters, set out in the Aarhus Convention and the Escazú Agreement.
What is a just transition?
An approach to moving to a low-carbon economy that protects workers and communities dependent on high-emission industries and shares costs and benefits fairly.
Does the platform represent affected communities?
No. It aims to include them in their own voice in dialogue. It does not speak for any community.
Can climate policy be both effective and fair?
Evidence suggests design choices, such as revenue recycling, targeted support and genuine participation, can improve both fairness and public support.
报告贡献

从本页贡献证据。

报告 is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

全球风险论坛(Global Risks Forum)气候与自然治理区域系统证据简报
气候与自然治理

把一个治理问题带到论坛。

信息和咨询现已开放。每项咨询都会获得一个编号,并告知下一步;申请、付款、算力分配和注册只有在相应团队、条款和审查能力就绪时才会开放。