The Global Risks Forum (GRF)
Institutional dialogues in climate and Nature Governance: structured conversations that compare evidence and options among the people who decide.
Justice hearing · Day 5 of 5 · Controlled · observed
| Adaptation council | 3 | 36 | Delayed |
| Basin commission | 5 | 28 | Responding |
| Disclosure regulator | 5 | 48 | Delayed |
| Indigenous council | 3 | 11 | Active |
Climate and Nature Governance · Exercise controlExercise control, in outline: domain structure with placeholder names and illustrative values, not a record.
Climate and Nature Governance dialogues are structured conversations in which those who govern climate and hazards, biodiversity and nature, water, and food and agriculture compare evidence and options on a question with an accountable owner. Each runs under agreed attribution rules, often the Chatham House Rule, and its outcome note is published with participants' consent. A dialogue is listed only once it is confirmed.
Fig.A programme from scoping to the owner's decision. Design, not a record.
For dialogues and cooperation, in GRF's situational-awareness reading, the map opens on flood water, land cover, population density and vegetation with relief in 3D and place names and borders from NASA GIBS, framed on World; 2 further NASA layers wait in the list.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 4
Water now, for this page
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
For dialogues and cooperation, in GRF's situational-awareness reading, the map opens on flood water, land cover, population density and vegetation with relief in 3D and place names and borders from NASA GIBS, framed on World; 2 further NASA layers wait in the list.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place; claim ceiling INTEGRATED.
Layers and dates
Each dialogue appears here once confirmed, with its host, format and terms. To propose one, write to dialogues@globalriskforum.com.
The governance problem this community is designed to address is fragmentation. Adaptation is reported to the UNFCCC, biodiversity to the CBD, land degradation to the UNCCD and disaster losses to the Sendai Framework, often by different ministries working to different calendars. Dialogues bring those focal points together around one landscape, basin or coastline.
| Format | Question | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Synergy dialogue | Where do NAP, NBSAP and DRR strategy commitments overlap on the same land? | Overlap map with owners |
| Basin dialogue | How do riparian institutions share drought and flood decisions? | Options paper on basin arrangements |
| Indicator clinic | How can the Belém adaptation indicators be reported from existing data? | Data-owner table |
Hazard and ecosystem evidence come from GCRI climate hazards and Biodiversity Nexus; nature-related financial risk is read on GRA's climate and nature financial risk.
Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Chatham House Rule | A rule under which participants may use information received but may not reveal the identity or affiliation of speakers. |
| Science-policy interface | The arrangements through which scientific evidence reaches public decisions, including advisory committees, chief scientific advisers, academies and intergovernmental assessments. |
| Track two dialogue | Informal dialogue among non-official participants, such as experts, that can explore options officials cannot. |
| Deliberative forum | A structured process in which participants weigh evidence and arguments together before reaching a view, the approach the OECD describes for representative deliberative processes. |
The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.
The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.