Skip to content

GRF · Research Nexus

Programmes and projects

How Research Nexus organises work into programmes: global priorities, regional applications and country work, each shown with its actual status.

Open Regional dialogue Back to Research Nexus
01Workspace

The workspace for programmes and projects.

Workstream tracker

Programmes and projects · Programme year 2 · Example interface, not a record

Two milestones at riskGRF · Research Nexus

Workstreams

owner · stage · status

Methods dialogue seriesPanel chairReviewM8 · week 25On track
Global network mappingPanel chairScopingM4 · week 22At risk
Science-policy interface reviewPanel chairReviewM7 · week 37At risk
Knowledge translation briefResearch network coordinatorScopingM8 · week 28Blocked
Research integrity policyResearch network coordinatorTestM4 · week 8At risk

Effort against plan

person-weeks

Methods dialogue36 pw of 26 pw requiredGlobal network mapping24 pw of 34 pw requiredScience-policy9 pw of 40 pw requiredKnowledge translation40 pw of 28 pw required

Milestones

  1. W7M1Methods dialogue series: scoping note signed
  2. W15M2Inputs qualified at the gate
  3. W22M3Global network mapping: build review
  4. W28M4Controlled test with observers
  5. W38M5Publication and decision record
Workstream tracker.Illustrative interface; not live data.

Research Nexus · Workstream tracker. Workstream tracker: example names and illustrative values, not a record.

02Levels

Three levels of work.

03Programme lines

Three lines of work the platform is designed to run.

LineQuestionOutput
Knowledge translationHow does a finding become usable by an agency?Translation notes and plain-language briefs
Research integrity in riskHow are preprints, models and data checked before they reach decisions?Integrity checklists for policy-facing research
Collaborative research designHow can agencies and universities co-design questions without compromising independence?Co-design protocols and agreements

Each line is designed; none is presented as running until its record exists.

04Process

How the process runs.

Process explorer · Process

Programmes and projects: Programme through eight gates

11 steps4 stages8 gates

Process

Programmes and projects: Programme through eight gates

The Global Risks Forum (GRF) records eight yearly gates, each a programme decision; a gate not passed stops its work, and the competent authority decides outside.

  1. 01 Q1 · Planning

    1. 01G0 · Annual programme authorisedGate · The Global Risks ForumGRF authorises the annual mandate. It never sets a national agenda.
    2. 03Route the candidate mission to standardsStep · Nexus StandardsNexus Standards routes each candidate mission to the standards and profiles that apply.

  2. 02 Q2 · Readiness and build

    1. 04G1 · Missions admittedGate · The Global Risks ForumGRF admits missions with reasons recorded. It cannot admit a mission without an accountable owner.
    2. 05G2 · Data and resources qualifiedGate · The Global Risks ForumReadiness preparation closes when data, people and resources are qualified.
    3. 06G3 · Build accepted for exerciseGate · The Global Risks ForumGRF records whether the build is accepted for exercise. A gate not passed stops the work it governs.

  3. 03 Q3 · Action Week

    1. 07G4 · Controlled live operation authorisedGate · The Global Risks ForumGRF authorises controlled live operation for Action Week.
    2. 08G5 · Evidence sealed and stand-down recordedGate · The Global Risks ForumThe evidence is sealed with its provenance and the stand-down is recorded.

  4. 04 Q4 · Reporting and renewal

    1. 02Competent authority decides and actsActor · The competent authorityThe competent authority decides and acts under its own rules. The programme informs it and never decides for it.
    2. 09Scientific and editorial reviewStep · Reviewers and the publisherQualified, conflict-managed reviewers and the publisher decide what is accepted. Institutions cannot decide a scientific conclusion.
    3. 10G6 · Publication authorisedGate · The Global Risks ForumGRF authorises publication of results that have passed scientific and editorial review. It cannot publish personal data.
    4. 11G7 · Renewal reviewedGate · The Global Risks ForumGRF reviews renewal and sets the next cycle's mandate.

The programme year · The Global Risks Forum · Decision rightsDesigned programme process, not a record of operation. No cycle has run and every programme is at service level R0. A gate is a programme decision, never a public-authority approval, certification or deployment authorisation.

05Status

Every programme shows where it stands.

A programme is shown as exploring, forming, constituted, active, paused or archived, according to its record. A plan is never presented as an activity.

06Sources

Where this page's references lead.

The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.

07Pages

Pages in Programmes and projects.

Page

Regional dialogue

Page

National applications

08Questions

Questions and answers.

How does a country take part?
Through its national programme. Country enquiries go to the Consortium Secretariat at Contact or a regional desk.
Research Nexus

Bring a governance question to the Forum.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

Propose a dialogue See all contact routes
Legal
Show all 18 legal documents

Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.