Skip to content

GRF · Information Integrity and Public Trust

Dialogues and cooperation

Institutional dialogues in information Integrity and Public Trust: structured conversations that compare evidence and options among the people who decide.

Make an enquiry Back to Information Integrity and Public Trust
01Contents

Dialogues and cooperation in four parts.

In this dossier4 parts
  1. 01StatusDialogues are listed when confirmed
  2. 02The information dialogueKeeping accurate information flowing in a crisis
  3. 03ConnectionsEvidence and topics
  4. 04SourcesWhere this page's references lead
02Status

Dialogues are listed when confirmed.

Each dialogue appears here once confirmed, with its host, format and terms. To propose one, write to Contact.

03The information dialogue

Keeping accurate information flowing in a crisis.

Information integrity dialogues ask how authorities, platforms, newsrooms and communities keep reliable information reaching people when a hazard strikes, while protecting freedom of expression. The questions are institutional: who issues authority information, how platforms escalate crisis content, how corrections travel and how communities without internet access are reached.

FormatQuestion
Crisis information dialogueHow do warning authorities and platforms coordinate during an event?
Rights-based reviewDoes a proposed measure meet legality, necessity and proportionality tests?
Community information sessionHow do local media and leaders carry authority information?
04Process

How the process runs.

Process explorer · Process

Dialogues and cooperation: Hazard, exposure, vulnerability

10 steps4 stages

Process

Dialogues and cooperation: Hazard, exposure, vulnerability

In IPCC AR6 Working Group II, climate risk results from interactions between hazards and a system's exposure and vulnerability, and responses can add risk.

  1. 01 Drivers

    1. 01HazardDataset · Community mediaThe potential occurrence of a natural or human-induced physical event or trend that may harm people, property, services or ecosystems.
    2. 02ExposureDataset · Community mediaThe presence of people, livelihoods, species, ecosystems, infrastructure or assets in places and settings that could be adversely affected.
    3. 03SensitivityDataset · Community mediaThe degree to which a system or species is affected, either adversely or beneficially, by climate variability or change.
    4. 04Capacity to cope and adaptDataset · Community mediaThe ability of systems, institutions, humans and other organisms to adjust to damage, take opportunities or respond to consequences.

  2. 02 Assessment

    1. 05Risk from responsesComponent · Community mediaRisks from climate responses arise when responses miss their objectives, or from trade-offs or negative side effects.
    2. 06VulnerabilityComponent · Community mediaThe propensity or predisposition to be adversely affected. It includes sensitivity to harm and lack of capacity to cope and adapt.
    3. 07RiskModel · Information Integrity and Public TrustRisk results from dynamic interactions between hazards and the system's exposure and vulnerability. Each may be uncertain and change.

  3. 03 Response

    1. 08Risk management and responseStep · Community mediaRisk management is plans, actions, strategies or policies that reduce the likelihood or size of adverse consequences.
    2. 09Residual riskRecord · Community mediaThe climate impact risk that remains after adaptation and mitigation efforts. Adaptation can redistribute risk between areas and groups.

  4. 04 Decision

    1. 10Decision by the responsible partyDecision · Community mediaThe framing names no single decision maker. Decisions on responses rest with the responsible party under its own rules.

Outline of an external standard or method, from its public sources. It describes what the framework says, not a record of any run. It does not show that Nexus or any partner performs, certifies or approves a step. A gate is a step of the method, never a Nexus approval.

06Sources

Where this page's references lead.

The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.

07Questions

Questions and answers.

Are dialogues public?
Each dialogue states its format. Outcome notes are published with participants' consent.
Information Integrity and Public Trust

Bring a governance question to the Forum.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

Propose a dialogue See all contact routes
Legal
Show all 18 legal documents

Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.