R-P05 · NETWORK · fieldGRF dossier · service level R0
GRFInformation Integrity and Public TrustIn development
Field overview

Discipline and institutional issues

Information integrity is the study of how accurate, reliable information is produced, shared and trusted, and of what degrades it. Public trust research asks why people trust some sources and not others, and how trust in institutions is built and lost. As a field of Information Integrity and Public Trust, it focuses on information under systemic stress: crises, rapid technological change and polarised environments. This overview sets out why it matters and what experts study.

Publisher
The Global Risks Forum
Field
Information and public trust, Society and human development
Status
In development
Service level
R0: information and enquiries

The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.

Layers 3

People and hazards, for this page

Latest available

NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth

Loading the latest NASA imagery.

Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.

For discipline and institutional issues, in GRF's situational-awareness reading, the map opens on population density, night lights and flood water, framed on Eastern Europe; 2 further NASA layers wait in the list.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place; claim ceiling INTEGRATED.

Data: NASA GIBS · ASTER GDEM · Blue Marble · © OpenStreetMap contributors · Natural Earth · GDACS · NASA EONETSources and licences

  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA's Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA's Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA's Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA's Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University. 2018. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density, Revision 11. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). CC BY 4.0
  • VIIRS Black Marble night-time lights, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; distributed by the NASA Level-1 and Atmosphere Archive and Distribution System (LAADS DAAC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • VIIRS near-real-time products (flood, land surface temperature, snow cover, corrected reflectance), NASA LANCE; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • NASA Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS), VIIRS 375 m active fire product, NASA LANCE; vector tiles via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA (ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003, NASA LP DAAC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Made with Natural Earth. Free vector and raster map data @ naturalearthdata.com. Public domain
  • © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), via NASA GIBS (coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). ODbL
  • Blue Marble, NASA Earth Observatory; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into H3 cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Context on the globe and flat map: coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names from NASA GIBS reference layers (OpenStreetMap data, ODbL, © OpenStreetMap contributors); Blue Marble imagery as an optional base; 3D terrain and the elevation read-out from the ASTER GDEM elevation colour index (5 m to 200 m classes, exaggerated for legibility). Boundaries are drawn as published and imply no position on any territory.
  • Globe: MapLibre GL JS 6.9.1, BSD-3-Clause, © MapLibre contributors.
  • Live: GDACS (EC JRC / UN OCHA) Events are indicative, not official warnings.
  • Live: NASA EONET Events are indicative, not official warnings.
  • Optional layers (5 sources in the layer list: live, forecast, observed and context) print their provider credit on the map and here when switched on; forecasts are model output and derived indices are estimates.

Layers and dates

  • Population density, 2020: Population: CIESIN, Columbia University, Gridded Population of the World v4.11 (2018), NASA SEDAC, CC BY 4.0 · static
  • Night-time lights, daily: VIIRS Black Marble (VNP46A2), NASA LAADS DAAC · 12 Oct 2026
  • Flood water, 3-day composite: VIIRS Global Flood Product, NASA LANCE · 14 Oct 2026
  • Active fires and thermal anomalies, last day: VIIRS NOAA-20 375 m (FIRMS), NASA LANCE FIRMS · 13 Oct 2026
  • True colour: VIIRS NOAA-20 corrected reflectance, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026

GeographyFor discipline and institutional issues, in GRF's situational-awareness reading, the map opens on population density, night lights and flood water, framed on Eastern Europe; 2 further NASA layers wait in the list.

STEM methods
3
Canonical methods this field applies
Topics
8
Subject pages in the field
Counterparts
5
Platforms in shared fields at GCRI, GRF and GRA
Report series
1
Nexus Reports series it contributes to
01In brief

The short answer.

The Information Integrity and Public Trust field covers trust, information quality, media governance and public communication under systemic stress and technological change. Experts in it study questions such as misinformation and disinformation and institutional trust, with methods such as social and behavioural science as well as artificial intelligence and machine learning. Its counterparts at GCRI and GRA look at the same systems through science and finance.

02Canvas

One field, three institutions.

Canvas · one field, three institutionsDesign, not a record
One field, three institutions: Information Integrity and Public Trust and its counterpartsGCRI studies the field as science, GRF governs and convenes it, GRA builds shared financial understanding; the Nexus Universe tests work across them and the competent authorities decide. Design of the arrangement, not a record.

Fig.How GCRI, GRF and GRA share one field while the authorities decide. Design, not a record.

03Console

Field overview, in outline.

The working screen behind this subject: its structure, terms and states. Names are placeholders and values illustrative.

Field overview: the screen's structure, terms and states for Information integrity.Placeholder names and illustrative values; a design, not a record or a live system.
04Why it matters

Collective action depends on information people trust.

Every response to a shared risk, from a flood warning to a public health measure to a long-term climate policy, depends on people understanding the situation and trusting those who explain it. Information that is false, misleading or simply absent can cost lives in a crisis and erode support for necessary policy over time.

The field is also about rights. Access to information and freedom of expression are fundamental, and measures to counter harmful information can themselves cause harm if they silence legitimate speech, entrench official narratives or are applied unequally. A credible field must study both the harms of degraded information and the risks of responses to it.

05What experts study

From content to trust to governance.

  1. 01

    Information harms

    How false and misleading content arises, spreads and affects behaviour. See Misinformation and disinformation and AI-generated information.

  2. 02

    Systems and incentives

    How media and platform business models and design shape what people see. See Platforms and media systems.

  3. 03

    Trust

    Why people trust institutions and sources, and what erodes or rebuilds trust. See Institutional trust.

  4. 04

    Communication

    How to communicate risk and uncertainty honestly, in crises and in science. See Crisis information and Science communication.

  5. 05

    Access and rights

    Who can access reliable information, and how governance protects rights. See Community information and Information governance and rights.

06Key terms

Terms used on this page.

Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.

TermDefinition
MisinformationFalse or misleading information that people share without any intent to deceive.
Coordinated inauthentic behaviourGroups of accounts working together to mislead people about who they are and what they are doing, as platforms use the term.
Content provenanceVerifiable information about the origin and edit history of a piece of digital media.
Systemic riskRisk arising from interconnections, where failure in one part can cascade through a whole system.
07Connections

How this field touches others.

Information integrity affects every domain where public understanding matters: health, disasters, climate, elections, finance and technology. Decision rights locates who decides on information governance questions.

08Pages

Pages in Discipline and institutional issues.

09Questions

Questions and answers.

Which methods does the field rely on?
Social and behavioural science, artificial intelligence and machine learning, and network science. Each is described on the STEM foundation page.
Is misinformation the main problem?
It is one part. Research increasingly points to underlying factors, such as distrust, polarisation and the decline of trusted local sources, as the conditions in which false content takes hold.
Does the field take sides in political debates?
No. It examines evidence on information quality and trust across the spectrum and applies the same standards to all sources.
Information Integrity and Public Trust

Bring your expertise to this field.

The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

Skip to toolbar