GRF · حکمرانی سوانح و بحران

روش‌ها و بحث انتقادی

The methods Disaster and Crisis Governance relies on to inform policy and governance decisions: comparative governance, policy analysis, foresight and exercises with institutions, with the mandates they serve and their limits.

01ثبت

Methods and critical debate on the record.

حکمرانی سوانح و بحران
  1. 01حوزه‌هاDisaster and crisis, زیرساخت‌های حیاتی
  2. 02روش‌های STEM3 روش مرجع به کار رفته
  3. 03موضوع‌ها8 صفحهٔ موضوعی
  4. 04همتاها12 platforms in shared fields
  5. 05ناشرGlobal Risks Forum
03Methods for crisis governance

Methods for crisis governance.

روشصفحه
Decision analysis under time pressureتحلیل تصمیم
Logistics and resource optimisationOptimisation
Institutional analysis of mandatesPolicy science
04فرایند

فرایند چگونه پیش می‌رود.

Process explorer · Process

Methods and critical debate: PRISMA 2020 review reporting

10 steps4 مرحله

فرایند

Methods and critical debate: PRISMA 2020 review reporting

PRISMA 2020 is a reporting guideline for systematic reviews; the steps follow its checklist, not a mandated sequence, and no Nexus document adopts it.

  1. 01 Plan

    1. 01Registration and protocolRecord · The review teamThe guideline asks for registration details, access to the protocol and any amendments.
    2. 02Eligibility criteriaRecord · The review teamThe guideline asks for the inclusion and exclusion criteria and how studies were grouped.
  2. 02 Find and select

    1. 03Search: sources and strategiesStep · The review teamThe guideline asks for the information sources and the full search strategies. It does not fix which sources are used.
    2. 04Selection of studiesStep · The review teamThe guideline asks how studies were judged eligible, including how many reviewers screened. It does not fix the number of reviewers.
    3. 05Flow diagramسابقهThe flow diagram shows the number of records found, the number of studies included and the reasons for exclusion.
  3. 03 Analyse

    1. 06Data collectionStep · The review teamThe guideline asks how data were collected from reports and which data items were sought.
    2. 07Risk of biasStep · The review teamThe guideline asks for the methods and tools used to assess risk of bias.
    3. 08SynthesisModel · The review teamThe guideline asks for the effect measures and the synthesis methods. It does not prescribe meta-analysis.
    4. 09قطعیت شواهدStep · The review teamThe guideline asks for the methods used to assess certainty, and reports the result per outcome. It does not name a grading scale.
  4. 04 Report

    1. 10Review reportسابقهThe guideline helps authors report why the review was done, what they did and what they found.

گزارش‌هاOutline of an externally published reporting guideline, not a Nexus process and not a record of operation. PRISMA 2020 mainly covers reviews of intervention effects. No Nexus page names it. Every programme is at service level R0.

05عدم قطعیت

How uncertainty is reported.

  1. 01

    State assumptions

    Each analysis lists its assumptions and the data it depends on.

  2. 02

    Quantify where possible

    Ranges and confidence are reported alongside central estimates.

  3. 03

    Validate and compare

    Models are checked against observations and, where possible, against other models.

  4. 04

    Publish limits

    What an analysis cannot show is stated beside what it can.

06منابع

Where this page’s references lead.

نهادها و اسنادی که این صفحه در برابر آن‌ها خوانده می‌شود. وضعیت و ویراست‌ها تغییر می‌کنند؛ هر پیوند به نهاد صادرکننده می‌رود.

07پرسش‌ها

پرسش و پاسخ.

Are the methods open?
Method descriptions are public on the STEM Commons. Code and data follow their own licences and access terms, listed in the source register.
گزارش‌هامشارکت

از همین صفحه شواهد بیفزایید.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

⁨Global Risks Forum⁩حکمرانی سوانح و بحرانUniverse: جمع‌بندی سالانهگزارش مختصر شواهد
حکمرانی سوانح و بحران

پرسش حکمرانی خود را نزد Forum بیاورید.

اطلاعات و پرسش‌ها از امروز باز است. هر پرسش شمارهٔ مرجعی می‌گیرد و گام بعد را نام می‌برد؛ درخواست‌ها، پرداخت‌ها، تخصیص توان رایانشی و ثبت‌نام‌ها تنها زمانی باز می‌شوند که تیم، شرایط و ظرفیت بررسی آن‌ها فراهم باشد.

The Global Risks Forum

Convening · leadership · urgency

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GRF is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.