Skip to content

GRF · Rêveberiya avhewa û xwezayê

Methods and critical debate

The methods Climate and Nature Governance relies on to inform policy and governance decisions: comparative governance, policy analysis, foresight and exercises with institutions, with the mandates they serve and their limits.

Pirsek bike Back to Research and institutional knowledge
01Rêzik

Rêza ku tişt tê de diqewimin.

  1. 01Pêşnûmeçavkanî hatine destnîşankirin, nîşan hatine danîn
  2. 02Kontrola delîlanher nirx hatiye şopandin
  3. 03Nirxandina serbixwenakokî hatine ragihandin
  4. 04Çapbi sînorên xwe re hatiye weşandin
  5. 05Rastkiringuhertoyeke nû, qet guhertineke bêdeng
02Rêbaz

The methods in use.

  1. Zanista avhewa û atmosferêScenarios for adaptation plans · Attribution in governance debatesApplied here
    Canonical · STEM Commons
  2. Zanista ekolojî û cûrbecûrbûna jîndaranCumulative effects in assessment · Protected-area representativeness · Restoration monitoringApplied here
    Canonical · STEM Commons
  3. Zanista siyasetê, saziyan û biryarêMandate and decision-rights mapping · Process tracing of commitmentsApplied here
    Canonical · STEM Commons
  4. Hîdrolojî û zanista avêAllocation under variable flow · Upstream project effects · Shared monitoring designApplied here
    Canonical · STEM Commons
  5. Zanista çandiniyê, axê û xwarinêIrrigation and crop choice · Drought impact on yields · Smallholder adaptation optionsApplied here
    Canonical · STEM Commons
03Methods behind climate and

Methods behind climate and nature governance.

RêbazRûpel
Climate projections and attributionZanista avhewayê
Ecosystem assessmentEkolojî
Water balance and basin modellingHîdrolojî
Institutional analysisPolicy science
04Pêvajo

Pêvajo çawa dimeşe.

Process explorer · Process

Methods and critical debate: PRISMA 2020 review reporting

10 steps4 qonax

Pêvajo

Methods and critical debate: PRISMA 2020 review reporting

PRISMA 2020 is a reporting guideline for systematic reviews; the steps follow its checklist, not a mandated sequence, and no Nexus document adopts it.

  1. 01 Plan

    1. 01Registration and protocolRecord · The review teamThe guideline asks for registration details, access to the protocol and any amendments.
    2. 02Eligibility criteriaRecord · The review teamThe guideline asks for the inclusion and exclusion criteria and how studies were grouped.

  2. 02 Find and select

    1. 03Search: sources and strategiesStep · The review teamThe guideline asks for the information sources and the full search strategies. It does not fix which sources are used.
    2. 04Selection of studiesStep · The review teamThe guideline asks how studies were judged eligible, including how many reviewers screened. It does not fix the number of reviewers.
    3. 05Flow diagramTomarThe flow diagram shows the number of records found, the number of studies included and the reasons for exclusion.

  3. 03 Analyse

    1. 06Data collectionStep · The review teamThe guideline asks how data were collected from reports and which data items were sought.
    2. 07Risk of biasStep · The review teamThe guideline asks for the methods and tools used to assess risk of bias.
    3. 08SynthesisModel · The review teamThe guideline asks for the effect measures and the synthesis methods. It does not prescribe meta-analysis.
    4. 09Bawerî bi delîlanStep · The review teamThe guideline asks for the methods used to assess certainty, and reports the result per outcome. It does not name a grading scale.

  4. 04 Report

    1. 10Review reportTomarThe guideline helps authors report why the review was done, what they did and what they found.

rêzeya Pergalên StratejîkOutline of an externally published reporting guideline, not a Nexus process and not a record of operation. PRISMA 2020 mainly covers reviews of intervention effects. No Nexus page names it. Every programme is at service level R0.

05Nediyarî

How uncertainty is reported.

  1. 01

    State assumptions

    Each analysis lists its assumptions and the data it depends on.

  2. 02

    Quantify where possible

    Ranges and confidence are reported alongside central estimates.

  3. 03

    Validate and compare

    Models are checked against observations and, where possible, against other models.

  4. 04

    Publish limits

    What an analysis cannot show is stated beside what it can.

06Çavkanî

Where this page’s references lead.

Sazî û belgeyên ku ev rûpel li hember wan tê xwendin. Rewş û çap diguherin; her girêdan diçe ba saziya derxistinê.

07Pirs

Pirs û bersiv.

Are the methods open?
Method descriptions are public on the STEM Commons. Code and data follow their own licences and access terms, listed in the source register.
rêzeya Pergalên StratejîkTevkarî bike

Ji vê rûpelê delîl bidin.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

Global Risks ForumRêveberiya avhewa û xwezayêPergalên herêmîKurteya delîlan

Tu carî daneyên şexsî, hûrgiliyên binesaza hesas an tiştekî ku mafê we yê parvekirinê tune ne neşînin. Beşdarî berî bikaranînê tê nirxandin; şandina wê nivîskarî an mafên edîtorî nade û sponsorî tu carî encamekê nakire.

Rêveberiya avhewa û xwezayê

Pirsek ya rêveberiyê bînin Forumê.

Agahî û pirs îro vekirî ne. Pirsek referansekê distîne û gava piştî wê dide nasîn; serlêdan, drav, veqetandina hesabkirinê û tomarkirin tenê dema ku tîm, mercên wê û kapasîteya vekolînê hebin vedibin.

Diyalogekê pêşniyar bikin Hemû rêyên têkiliyê bibînin
Hiqûqî
Hemû 18 belgeyên qanûnî nîşan bide

Nexşe, dane û jimarên vê malperê ji bo çarçoveyê û agahiyên giştî têne nîşandan. Ew ne şîret, ne pêşbînî û ne hişyarî ne; sînorên agahiyê di Daxuyaniyên Berpirsiyariyê û Daxuyaniyên Daneyê de hatine diyarkirin.