GRF · Capital Nexus
Publish in Reports
How Capital Nexus contributes to the Reports series. Canonical editions are published on Reports.
The order things happen in.
- 01Draftsources cited, labels attached
- 02Evidence checkevery value traced
- 03Independent reviewconflicts declared
- 04Editionpublished with its limits
- 05Correctiona new version, never a silent edit
Reports among the six pillars.
Where all outputs are published, in all formats, across its five sites, each with sources, limits and corrections. It is led by the Nexus Consortium; its home is therisk.global/nexus-reports.
handoff in playrecorded handoffno direct handoff
Programme yearAll phases
Route
Around Reports
The pillars Reports hands work to and receives it from.
L · F · U · S · R · A
- Pillars
- 5 of 6
- Handoffs
- 16 of 18
- Loops
- 16 closed
Handoffs in play
- F01Universe → Foundry · Admitted mission becomes a cycle project with a decision caseReadiness preparation
- F02Foundry → Universe · Core Build Report and go or no-go evidenceControlled build
- F03Foundry → Reports · Sealed observations and indicator series behind a profileCloseout
- F04Universe → Reports · After-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13After-action review
and 12 more
- LabsWhere questions become experiments and prototypes: new methods, data and tools are tried in the open, with their limits on record, before the Foundry builds them, under the Nexus Consortium.Labs
- FoundryWhere the evidence behind a mandate or commitment is built, with its owner and limits on record.Capital Nexus in FoundryFoundry
- UniverseWhere mandates become missions: The Global Risks Forum (GRF) records each gate, convenes the parties and keeps implementation accountable.Capital Nexus in Universeuniverse.nexus
- Nexus StandardsWhere shared rules are agreed in the open; each jurisdiction decides adoption, and no global body holds a veto.Finance, Insurance and the Economy in Standardsnexustandards.com
- ReportsWhere governance analysis and the year’s results are published, so commitments can be followed and checked.Capital Nexus in ReportsReports
- Risk AcademyWhere policymakers, diplomats and agency staff learn the programme roles and decision-making on the record, on Risk Academy.Faculty of Finance and Economics in Academyrisksacademy.com
Reports in every area of the work
| Area | Reports |
|---|---|
| Leadership | Series editors lead each edition under the series method; no funder, sponsor or member can buy or block a finding. |
| Strategy | Each country programme agrees the scope of its profile before Q1, and nothing outside that scope is published. |
| Cadence | Quarterly: Q1 State and Agenda, Q2 Evidence and Build, Q3 Stress Test and Readiness, and the Q4 Annual Synthesis as the flagship; an edition is published after review, not to a calendar. |
| Ownership | Owns editions and their evidence cutoff, country and regional profiles, technology stream briefs and the correction history. |
| Process | Contribution, editorial review, publication with version history, then challenge and correction as a new version. |
| Development | Develops country profiles each quarter, regional profiles twice a year and one exponential technology stream at a time. |
| Simulations | Publishes scenario findings labelled as modelled, with their uncertainty. |
| Reporting | Publishes every output in every format across its five sites, each edition with sources, limits and corrections. |
| Governance | Publication is not authority: an edition is never a government risk register or a sovereign rating, and countries are never ranked. |
| Data and evidence | Observed, modelled and estimated evidence stay apart, and each edition states its evidence cutoff. |
| Finance and resourcing | The Finance and Insurance Readiness and the Portfolio and Readiness series make the evidence readable to finance. |
| Risk and assurance | Each finding states its method, uncertainty and limits, and reproducible concerns go to the owner of the finding. |
| Participation | Researchers and practitioners contribute reviewed findings, and any reader can challenge a finding. |
| Communication | Every output is published in accessible formats with its version history. |
| Local | Local evidence enters a profile only within the scope its country agreed. |
| National | Country profiles are updated each quarter, within the scope each country agreed before Q1. |
| Regional | Regional profiles are published twice a year, in Q2 and Q4, and never override a country’s own findings. |
| Planetary | The Q4 Annual Synthesis reads country, regional and technology work together, without ranking countries. |
What each institution brings
| Pillar | GCRI | GRF | GRA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports | Hosts the canonical Reports site and publishes evidence on countries, sectors and methods. | Publishes governance analysis and authorises publication of the year’s results at gate G6. | Publishes sector analysis and the finance and insurance readiness series. |
What Capital Nexus adds to Reports.
A governance chapter on finance for the edition’s theme: which instruments exist, who decides their use and how releases were reported. Financial findings remain GRA’s and are labelled as such.
How the process runs.
Process explorer · Process
Publish in Reports: Due diligence to suspicion report
9 steps·4 stages
Process
Publish in Reports: Due diligence to suspicion report
The FATF Recommendations set customer due diligence, transaction scrutiny and suspicion reporting to the financial intelligence unit, without prescribing monitoring systems.
01 Know the customer
- 01Customer due diligenceDataset · Development partnerThe institution verifies the customer and beneficial owner and understands the relationship’s purpose. Due diligence is ongoing.
- 03Risk-based approach and customer riskModel · Development partnerMeasures are proportionate to the risks identified. The Recommendations read here do not fix risk labels or the review period.
02 Monitor
- 02TransactionsSource · Development partnerTransactions through the relationship are the input to scrutiny.
- 04Transaction monitoringModel · Development partnerTransactions are checked against what the institution knows of the customer, their business and risk profile.
03 Investigate
- 05Alert reviewStep · Development partnerFlagged activity is reviewed and either closed or escalated for investigation. The Recommendations do not describe this step.
- 06InvestigationStep · Development partnerAn escalated case is examined to decide whether suspicion exists. The Recommendations do not describe the case process.
04 Decide and report
- 07Decision to reportDecision · Compliance officer at management level (in some countries called the MLRO)If the institution suspects funds are crime proceeds or linked to terrorist financing, law should require it to report promptly.
- 08Report to the FIUStep · Development partnerThe report goes to the financial intelligence unit, the national centre for such reports. The text says promptly, with no day count.
- 09Test and improve monitoringStep · Development partnerAn independent audit function tests the system. Authorities should give guidance and feedback that help detection and reporting.
Outline of an external standard or method, from its public sources. It describes what the framework says, not a record of any run. It does not show that Nexus or any partner performs, certifies or approves a step. A gate is a step of the method, never a Nexus approval. Steps shown as general practice are marked in the QA record. The Recommendations here apply to financial institutions.
Where this field publishes.
- 01
Finance and Insurance Readiness
- 02
Evidence Brief
From finding to edition.
- 01
Contribution
A reviewed finding with its method, evidence labels and limits.
- 02
Editorial review
Series editors check scope, method and consistency.
- 03
Publication
The edition is published with its version history.
- 04
Correction
Challenges are answered and corrections published as new versions.
Where this page’s references lead.
The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.
Questions and answers.
Who decides what is published?
Contribute evidence from this page.
Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- EmailGateway GW-GRFSend it from this pageEvidence, a correction, a case, a method, a review, a translation or profile input. It arrives tagged with this page, so the editor who owns it receives it.
- ZenodoOpen depositDeposit it and submit to the communityPublish your own record on Zenodo with your ORCID iD, then submit it to the Reports community there. Curators review it; the DOI stays yours.
- ReportsGlobal Risks ForumSee every way to contributeThe contribution types, how each is reviewed, what credit you receive, the licence and what is never accepted.
Never send personal data, sensitive infrastructure detail or anything you have no right to share. A contribution is reviewed before use; sending it confers no authorship or editorial rights, and sponsorship never buys a finding.
Bring a governance question to the Forum.
Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.
Legal documents.
Show all 18 legal documents
Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.