Data appendix

The indicator set with its sources, the source registers, the licences of every kind of material and the formats of the edition.

7 min read0 figures7 tables18 notesNR-COUNTRY-JPN-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
  3. 1Japan’s risk is seismic, climatic and demographic at once
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5Great earthquake in an ageing region
  8. 6Lenses and readings
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
  11. AMethodology
  12. BData appendix
    1. B.1 The indicator set
    2. B.2 National source register
    3. B.3 Regional reading, Japan by region
    4. B.4 Atlas card, Noto Peninsula (Ishikawa)
    5. B.5 Japan system card
    6. B.6 Licences
    7. B.7 Formats and provenance
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

B.1The indicator set

Table B.1Baseline indicator set
IndicatorValueUnitYearStateSource
GHG emissions (gross)1,071Mt CO₂eFY2023Reported1
GHG emissions (net)1,017Mt CO₂eFY2023Reported1
Change since FY2013 (net)−27.1%FY2023Reported1
Energy-related CO₂922Mt CO₂FY2023Reported2
Clean share of electricity>30%FY2023Reported2
Energy self-sufficiency≈15%FY2023Reported5
Food self-sufficiency (calories)38%FY2023Reported16
Population123.8million2024Reported15
Aged 65 or over29.3%2024Reported15
Births≈686,000births2024Reported14
Heatstroke ambulance transports≈97,600people2024Reported12
Heatstroke deaths1,651deaths2023Reported13
Nankai Trough worst-case deaths≈298,000deathsScenarioScenario9
Nankai Trough worst-case damage≈292¥ trillionScenarioScenario9
Protected land≈20.5%2023Reported19
Protected sea≈13.3%2023Reported19
Homes with earthquake insurance≈35%2023Reported22

B.2National source register

The governed source set behind this edition. Each source keeps its authority, coverage, cadence and role; categories describe origin, not truth.

Domains bound by the register

  • WAT
  • ENE
  • FOO
  • HLT
  • BIO
  • CLI
  • INF
  • FIN
  • TRD
  • MIN
Table B.3National source register
SourceCategoryCoveragePeriodCadenceRole
GHG inventory FY20231national technical authoritynationalFY1990–2023annualCLI · ENE
Climate monitoring67national technical authoritynationalto 2024annualCLI
Disaster white paper8governmentnational2024annualcapability
Nankai Trough estimates9government councilregional2025periodicSEI
Seismic evaluations10government headquartersnational2025periodicSEI
Noto damage reports11governmentregional2024–2026per eventSEI
Heatstroke transports12national agencynational2024annualHLT
Vital statistics1314national statisticsnational2023–2024annualHLT
Population estimates15national statisticsnational2024annualprofile
Food self-sufficiency16ministry statisticsnationalFY2023annualFOO
Earthquake insurance22industrynational2023annualFIN

B.3Regional reading, Japan by region

Map plates for every prefecture follow in Q2 2027, when boundary sources and public-safe resolutions are bound. This page gives the regional reading in table form.

Selected populations15

13.4million

Tokyo Metropolis

8.8million

Osaka Prefecture

5.1million

Hokkaido

≈0.5million

Noto-region Ishikawa (northern)

Table B.4Regional reading, Japan by region
RegionPrincipal hazardsSystems most exposedBaseline evidence
Hokkaido and Tōhokuearthquakes, tsunami, heavy snowenergy, food, fisheriesTōhoku 2011
KantōTokyo-area earthquake, floods, heatfinance, power, transportHagibis 201920
Chūbu and Hokurikuearthquakes, heavy snow and rainmanufacturing, waterNoto 202411
KinkiNankai Trough, typhoonsports, industryJebi 201823
Chūgoku and Shikokuheavy rain, landslides, Nankai Troughrural communitieswestern Japan floods 2018
Kyūshū and Okinawaheavy rain, typhoons, volcanoessemiconductors, agricultureKumamoto 2016

B.4Atlas card, Noto Peninsula (Ishikawa)

  • region
  • peninsula
  • ageing community
  • remote lifelines
Systems in view
water, roads, power, health and care
Defining events
M7.6 earthquake on 1 January 2024; heavy-rain disaster in September 202411
Couplings
SEI → WAT → HLT; SEI → INF; CLI → INF
Capability evidence
national response and mutual aid in real events
Gaps
water restoration time; care continuity; relocation
Agenda items
A-01 · A-04

Broken mains left many households without piped water for weeks to months, the defining hardship of the recovery.

WATER

Months without pipes

Cold, displacement and interrupted care raised deaths among older residents after the earthquake itself.

HEALTH AND CARE

Disaster-related deaths

Landslides cut the few roads into the peninsula, delaying relief and supplies.

ROADS

Isolated by the terrain

B.5Japan system card

The card through which Japan appears in the East Asia regional edition and the global series. It summarises; it does not rank.

Table B.5Japan system card
SystemBaseline stateCoupling to watchCoverage
Watersteep rivers; seismic pipe exposureearthquake into carePARTIAL
Energyclean power >30%; imported fuelimport disruptionGOOD
Food38% self-sufficiencyimport shocksGOOD
Healthageing; heatheat and disaster loadGOOD
Biodiversityhigh endemismland use and invasivesPARTIAL

Context

Archetype
high-income, ageing island economy with extreme seismic exposure
Population
123.8 million (2024)15
Trade
import-dependent for fuel, food and feed516
Hazard
Nankai Trough worst case ¥292 trillion9

Japan’s card sits beside its neighbours’; shared basins, grids, corridors and supply chains are read as one regional system.

EAST ASIA REGIONAL EDITION

One regional system

Japanese evidence enters the water, energy, food, finance and climate sector reports through the same finding identifiers, so a correction travels everywhere at once.

GLOBAL SECTOR SERIES

Same findings, same IDs

In the global edition Japan is read against peer distributions and thresholds, never placed in a league table.

GLOBAL FLAGSHIP

Peers, not ranks

B.6Licences

Table B.6Licences of each kind of material
MaterialLicence
TextCC BY 4.0
Dataon the licence of each source; Nexus tables CC BY 4.0
FiguresNexus figures CC BY 4.0; third-party as credited
Mapsboundary source and licence printed on each plate
MetadataCC0 1.0, as Zenodo publishes it
Third-party data, figures and textThe source’s own licence, credited where it is used; never relicensed
Nexus-authored text, tables and figures: CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0). Map plates print their boundary source and licence.

B.7Formats and provenance

Table B.7This edition in every format
FormatKindStateWhat it isIdentifier
Web editionHTMLOn this siteDraft in stewardship review; every value resolves to its source.NR-COUNTRY-JPN-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Print editionPDFAt releaseA4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF, signed with the web edition at release.NR-COUNTRY-JPN-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Indicator dataCSV · JSONOn this site17 indicators with unit, year, status and source; the machine-readable copy ships with the evidence bundle at release.NR-COUNTRY-JPN-2026-BASELINE data release v1
FiguresSVG · PNGOn this site4 on the web edition: headline figure, figure 1.3, coupling instrument, capability ladder.FIG-COUNTRY-JPN-2026-BASELINE-*
SlidesPDFNot recordedNo slide deck is recorded for this edition.
Evidence briefHTML · PDFNot recordedNo evidence brief is recorded for this edition.
Dataset with DOIDataCiteAt releaseConcept and version DOI are minted at deposit; none is recorded yet.

Provenance

Edition pack
The edition’s content pack (JSON), from which the print and web editions are built
Evidence cut
NQ-JPN-2026-Q0-1, closed 30 September 2026
Reproducibility
sourced values cited; analytical values reproducible from stated parameters
Self-check
14 of 23 at evidence close; a fail on any item blocks release
Review
five passes scheduled before release
Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) for the Nexus Consortium
Corrections
Registry correction pathway; upheld corrections are published as notices with a new version

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1Ministry of the Environment and National Institute for Environmental Studies (eds.), Japan’s National Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals in FY2023. MoE, Tokyo, April 2025.back
  2. 2Ministry of the Environment (ed.), Progress of the Plan for Global Warming Countermeasures in FY2023. MoE, Tokyo, 2025.back
  3. 5Agency for Natural Resources and Energy (ed.), Annual Report on Energy (Energy White Paper) 2025. METI, Tokyo, 2025.back
  4. 16Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (ed.), Food self-sufficiency ratio, FY2023. MAFF, Tokyo, August 2024.back
  5. 15Statistics Bureau of Japan (ed.), Population Estimates as of 1 October 2024. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Tokyo, 2025.back
  6. 14Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (ed.), Vital Statistics 2024 (births). MHLW, Tokyo, 2025.back
  7. 12Fire and Disaster Management Agency (ed.), “Heatstroke emergency transports, May–September 2024.” FDMA, Tokyo, October 2024.back
  8. 13Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (ed.), Vital Statistics: deaths from heatstroke, 2023. MHLW, Tokyo, 2024.back
  9. 9Central Disaster Management Council, Working Group on Nankai Trough Megaquake Countermeasures (ed.), Revised damage estimates for a Nankai Trough megaquake. Cabinet Office, Tokyo, March 2025.back
  10. 19Ministry of the Environment (ed.), “30by30 roadmap and protected-area statistics.” MoE, Tokyo, retrieved 2026-09-30.back
  11. 22General Insurance Rating Organization of Japan (ed.), Earthquake insurance statistics, 2023. GIROJ, Tokyo, 2024.back
  12. 6Japan Meteorological Agency (ed.), Climate Change Monitoring Report 2024. JMA, Tokyo, 2025.back
  13. 7Japan Meteorological Agency (ed.), “Characteristics of the climate in Japan in 2024.” JMA, Tokyo, January 2025.back
  14. 8Cabinet Office (ed.), White Paper on Disaster Management 2025. Cabinet Office, Tokyo, 2025.back
  15. 10Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion (ed.), Long-term evaluation of earthquakes along the Nankai Trough (revised). MEXT, Tokyo, 2025.back
  16. 11Cabinet Office (ed.), “Damage situation of the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake.” Cabinet Office, Tokyo, retrieved 2026-09-30.back
  17. 20Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (ed.), White Paper on Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism in Japan 2025. MLIT, Tokyo, 2025.back
  18. 23General Insurance Association of Japan (ed.), “Insurance payouts for major windstorm and flood losses.” GIAJ, Tokyo, retrieved 2026-09-30.back

Cite this annex

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Annex B: Data appendix. In Japan Systems Risk and Resilience Report 2026: The State of Japan’s Interdependent Systems (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-COUNTRY-JPN-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Japan.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

Global Risks ForumCountry Systems Risk and Resilience
The Global Risks Forum

Convening · leadership · urgency

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Support our work

Who funds us

GRF is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.