Japan’s risk is seismic, climatic and demographic at once

Part I describes systems and their couplings. It assesses no authority and ranks no prefecture.

6 min read2 figures2 tables15 notesNR-COUNTRY-JPN-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
  3. 1Japan’s risk is seismic, climatic and demographic at once
    1. 1.1 The questions this part answers
    2. 1.2 The argument
    3. 1.3 Twenty couplings between five systems
    4. 1.4 Reinforcing loops
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5Great earthquake in an ageing region
  8. 6Lenses and readings
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
  11. AMethodology
  12. BData appendix
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

1.1The questions this part answers

Key questions

  • Where is Japan’s risk concentrated, and in which systems?
  • Which couplings carry shocks from one system to the next?
  • Which capabilities hold under compound stress, and which are only documented?
  • What must the 2027 programme measure first?

In this part

  • Narrative
  • Headline finding
  • Lead figure
  • Five system chapters
  • Twelve-domain reading
  • Sector screens
  • Dependency matrix
  • Risk objects
  • Capability ladder
  • Scenario
  • Three lenses
  • Portfolio

1.2The argument

Japan is usually described as the most disaster-prepared country in the world, and in many respects it is. This baseline reads its exposure as three slow and fast forces acting together: great earthquakes and tsunamis, a warming climate that intensifies heat and rain, and a population that is shrinking and ageing faster than almost any other.

The seismic layer dominates the tail. The 2025 revision of the Nankai Trough estimate puts worst-case losses at about 298,000 deaths and ¥292 trillion in damage9, and the national evaluation keeps the probability of such an event within thirty years high10. The Noto Peninsula earthquake of January 2024 showed the shape of the risk in miniature: water, roads, power and care failed together in a remote, ageing region, and heavy rain struck the same area again in September11.

The climate layer is rising. 2024 was the warmest year on record, and the long-term trend is about 1.4 °C per century67. About 97,600 people were taken to hospital by ambulance for heatstroke in the summer of 202412, and heavy-rain disasters such as Typhoon Hagibis in 2019 have breached levees at scale20.

The demographic layer changes everything else. 29.3% of the population is 65 or over, and births fell to about 686,000 in 20241415. An older, smaller population means more people who need help to evacuate, fewer workers to respond, and rural infrastructure that is harder to maintain.

Beneath all three sits import dependence. Japan imports almost all of its fossil fuel and grows only 38% of its food on a calorie basis516. Emissions have fallen to a record low, and renewables and nuclear passed 30% of electricity in FY202312, but energy and food security still depend on sea lanes and world prices.

This edition therefore reads Japan’s risk as a property of the couplings between these forces. The matrix, risk objects, capability ladder and scenario that follow ask the same two questions: where does a shock travel next, and who holds the capability to stop it?

Figure 1.1How far has Japan cut emissions, and how far is left? Emissions and targets (Mt CO₂e)

Net emissions fell by 378 Mt between FY2013 and FY2023. About 257 Mt more must go by FY2030, two-thirds of a decade’s progress in seven years13.

ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
FY20131395
FY2023 gross1071
FY2023 net1017
FY2030 target (net)760

Source: as cited in the note to this figure. Year FY2023.

Figure ID FIG-COUNTRY-JPN-2026-BASELINE-01-003

922Mt CO₂

energy-related CO₂, FY20232

340Mt CO₂

industry sector, FY20232

53.7Mt

forest and land removals1

2050net zero

statutory goal29

1.3Twenty couplings between five systems

The Japan matrix types the twenty couplings between the five core systems. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited evidence and analogue events; they set the starting graph that the Q1 2027 Foundry cut will test.

Figure 1.2Couplings between the five systems

Each line is one coupling from one system to another, drawn by the strength the edition assigns. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited evidence and analogue events.

  • Strong
  • Moderate
  • Weak

Source: this edition’s coupling matrix (Table 1.1); status Estimated.

Table 1.1Coupling matrix: from the row system to the column system
From, toWATENEFOOHLTBIO
WAT Water·STRONG
nuclear cooling · hydro
STRONG
irrigation · rain-fed yield
MODERATE
drinking water
STRONG
flows · wetlands
ENE EnergyMODERATE
pumping · treatment
·STRONG
fuel · fertiliser · cold chain
STRONG
facility power · cooling
MODERATE
reservoirs · land use
FOO FoodMODERATE
withdrawals · nutrients
WEAK
biofuel feedstock
·STRONG
nutrition · food safety
STRONG
land conversion
HLT HealthWEAK
workforce
WEAK
workforce
MODERATE
labour · disease
·WEAK
residues
BIO BiodiversitySTRONG
regulation · filtration
MODERATE
fire on lines · biomass
STRONG
pollination · soils
MODERATE
zoonoses · smoke
·
Strength: strong, moderate or weak; a Nexus estimate (status Estimated) from cited evidence and analogue events. The scale is defined in Annex A.

Transmission paths

  1. 01

    SEI → WAT → HLT

    An earthquake breaks pipes; care homes and hospitals lose water for weeks.

    Reported Noto 202411

  2. 02

    SEI → ENE → all

    A great earthquake shuts coastal plants and refineries.

    Reported Tōhoku 2011

  3. 03

    CLI → WAT → INF

    Heavy rain breaches levees and cuts transport.

    Reported Hagibis 201920

  4. 04

    CLI → HLT

    Heat waves load ambulances and care settings.

    Reported summer 202412

  5. 05

    TRD → ENE → FOO

    Fuel and fertiliser price shocks pass into food costs.

    Inferred 2022 price shock

1.4Reinforcing loops

A shock entering either system of a loop can return amplified through the other.

Table 1.2Pairs of systems where both directions are rated strong
LoopFirst directionSecond direction
WAT and BIOWater to biodiversity: flows · wetlandsBiodiversity to water: regulation · filtration
FOO and BIOFood to biodiversity: land conversionBiodiversity to food: pollination · soils
A causal-loop reading of the matrix (Sterman, Business Dynamics, 2000): structural, from estimated strengths, not a measured feedback.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 9Central Disaster Management Council, Working Group on Nankai Trough Megaquake Countermeasures (ed.), Revised damage estimates for a Nankai Trough megaquake. Cabinet Office, Tokyo, March 2025.back
  2. 10Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion (ed.), Long-term evaluation of earthquakes along the Nankai Trough (revised). MEXT, Tokyo, 2025.back
  3. 11Cabinet Office (ed.), “Damage situation of the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake.” Cabinet Office, Tokyo, retrieved 2026-09-30.back
  4. 6Japan Meteorological Agency (ed.), Climate Change Monitoring Report 2024. JMA, Tokyo, 2025.back
  5. 7Japan Meteorological Agency (ed.), “Characteristics of the climate in Japan in 2024.” JMA, Tokyo, January 2025.back
  6. 12Fire and Disaster Management Agency (ed.), “Heatstroke emergency transports, May–September 2024.” FDMA, Tokyo, October 2024.back
  7. 20Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (ed.), White Paper on Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism in Japan 2025. MLIT, Tokyo, 2025.back
  8. 14Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (ed.), Vital Statistics 2024 (births). MHLW, Tokyo, 2025.back
  9. 15Statistics Bureau of Japan (ed.), Population Estimates as of 1 October 2024. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Tokyo, 2025.back
  10. 5Agency for Natural Resources and Energy (ed.), Annual Report on Energy (Energy White Paper) 2025. METI, Tokyo, 2025.back
  11. 16Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (ed.), Food self-sufficiency ratio, FY2023. MAFF, Tokyo, August 2024.back
  12. 1Ministry of the Environment and National Institute for Environmental Studies (eds.), Japan’s National Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals in FY2023. MoE, Tokyo, April 2025.back
  13. 2Ministry of the Environment (ed.), Progress of the Plan for Global Warming Countermeasures in FY2023. MoE, Tokyo, 2025.back
  14. 3Government of Japan (ed.), Japan’s Nationally Determined Contribution (targets for FY2035 and FY2040). Submission to the UNFCCC, February 2025.back
  15. 29Government of Japan (ed.), Act on the Promotion of a Smooth Transition to a Decarbonised Growth-Oriented Economic Structure (GX Promotion Act), Act No. 32 of 2023. Tokyo, 2023.back

Cite this chapter

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Chapter 1: Japan’s risk is seismic, climatic and demographic at once. In Japan Systems Risk and Resilience Report 2026: The State of Japan’s Interdependent Systems (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-COUNTRY-JPN-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Japan.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

Global Risks ForumCountry Systems Risk and Resilience
The Global Risks Forum

Convening · leadership · urgency

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Support our work

Who funds us

GRF is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.