GRF · Information Integrity and Public Trust

Leadership and skills

Learning paths of Information Integrity and Public Trust in information and public trust and society and human development, built on the methods of the STEM Commons and linked to recognised providers.

01Workspace

The workspace for leadership and skills.

Community workspace

Information integrity · Leadership and skills · Example interface, not a record

3 requests to reviewGRF · Information Integrity and Public Trust

Working groups

Community media WG269Week 19Active
Verification WG309Week 35Chair needed
Platform liaison WG316Week 26Chair needed
Prebunking WG1811Week 36Active

Join requests

  1. J-1Hydrologist, early careerCommunity media WG6 d
  2. J-2Utility engineerVerification WG8 d
  3. J-3Conflict of interest to declarePlatform liaison WG2 d

Contributions

Proposed01
Crisis rumour responsecredit: named
In review01
Provenance labelling pilottwo reviewers
Accepted01
Narrative monitorcredited on record
Community workspace.Illustrative interface; not live data.

Information Integrity and Public Trust · Community workspace. Community workspace: example names and illustrative values, not a record.

02Paths

Start from the methods.

Social and behavioural scienceArtificial intelligence and machine learningNetwork science and contagion

Each method links to its canonical page, which lists teaching material as it is published.

03Learning paths

Skills for information integrity.

  • Communicating uncertainty.
  • Pre-bunking techniques.
  • The three-part test for restrictions on expression.
  • Measuring information spread.

See network science.

04Process

How the process runs.

Process

Leadership and skills: Working group, charter to sunset

A working group is chartered by record for a fixed timebox, delivers bounded assignments, drafts and recommends, then dissolves unless renewed; it does not adopt.

  1. 01 Form

    1. 01NLC proposes the groupDecision · National Leadership CouncilThe NLC proposes working groups and nominates chairs, editors and experts from its leadership pools. It does not charter.
    2. 02Charter by recordDecision · National Standards CouncilA working group is chartered by record for a timebox of at most twenty-four months. The charter sets its scope, roles and decision rule.
    3. 03Members join by competenceStep · MembersExperts, practitioners, students and volunteers join by competence. Members declare interests and recuse on conflict.
  2. 02 Work

    1. 04Workplan from the national agendaStepAssignments come from the national agenda and the year’s missions. Each states the competence it needs and how the work will be reviewed.
    2. 05Drafts and deliverables, delivered monthlyRecordGroups deliver monthly. For standards they draft the national profile and deviation register and run national public comment and pilots.
  3. 03 Review

    1. 06Contribution record and reviewGateEach contribution is recorded and reviewed. A working group drafts and recommends; it does not adopt.
    2. 07Recognition follows the recordRecordContribution records are kept, so that recognition follows the record.
    3. 08National adoption is decided elsewhereDecision · National Standards CouncilThe National Standards Council decides the adoption mode and the national profile. The working group proposes and never decides.
  4. 04 Close

    1. 09Dissolved by default, or renewed by recordDecision · National Standards CouncilA group is dissolved by default at the end of the timebox. The National Standards Council renews or closes it, on the NLC’s proposal.

National Working Groups · National Standards Council · Decision rightsDesigned programme process, not a record of operation. No cycle has run and every programme is at service level R0. A gate is a programme decision, never a public-authority approval, certification or deployment authorisation. No working group is constituted. The charter rules belong to the proposed Nexus Standards working model.

05Status

How courses are added.

Courses are listed once approved, with their provider, level and terms. Completing a course is a learning record, not a professional licence or certification.

06Sources

Where this page’s references lead.

The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.

07Questions

Questions and answers.

Are courses free?
Each course states its own terms when it is listed.
Information Integrity and Public Trust

Bring a governance question to the Forum.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

The Global Risks Forum

Convening · leadership · urgency

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Support our work

Who funds us

GRF is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.