GRF · Health and Biosecurity Governance

Epidemiology and public health science at Health and Biosecurity Governance

Epidemiology studies how disease spreads and who it affects. In health and biosecurity governance it supplies the evidence for declarations, measures and allocation, and it shows decision makers the uncertainty in early estimates of transmissibility and severity.

02Application

What epidemiology and public health science does here.

Epidemiology studies the distribution and determinants of health and disease in populations. It provides the evidence used to detect outbreaks, estimate burden and evaluate interventions. In health and biosecurity, epidemiological evidence informs preparedness, resource allocation and the economic consequences of disease. It shows how health shocks interact with travel, labour, supply chains and public finance. The canonical description is on the STEM Commons.

Early outbreak parameters

Case data are used to estimate reproduction numbers, growth rates and severity with their uncertainty, so decision makers see how much early estimates can move.

Equity in outcomes

Infection, hospitalisation and death rates are compared by age, income, occupation and region to show who carries the burden of an emergency and of the measures.

Evaluating measures

Natural experiments and comparisons between regions estimate the effect of measures, with confounding and data limits stated.

03Geography

Environmental exposure in Southern Africa.

Population density, daytime surface heat and haze over Southern Africa, from NASA GIBS. Each layer carries its own date.

The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.

Layers 3

Environmental exposure, for this page

Latest available

NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth

Loading the latest NASA imagery.

Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.

Environmental exposure, framed on Southern Africa.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date. They are indicators, not assessments of any place.

Data: NASA GIBS · ASTER GDEM · Blue Marble · © OpenStreetMap contributors · Natural Earth · NASA EONET · U.S. Geological Survey · NOAA GOES-East ABI GeoColorSources and licences

  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA's Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA's Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA's Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA's Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University. 2018. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density, Revision 11. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). doi:10.7927/H49C6VHW. CC BY 4.0
  • VIIRS near-real-time products (flood, land surface temperature, snow cover, corrected reflectance), NASA LANCE; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • MODIS and VIIRS atmosphere products, NASA LANCE and LAADS DAAC; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • OMI nitrogen dioxide (Aura) and OMPS aerosol index (Suomi NPP), NASA; distributed by the NASA GES DISC; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • VIIRS Black Marble night-time lights, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; distributed by the NASA Level-1 and Atmosphere Archive and Distribution System (LAADS DAAC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • ASTER GDEM is a product of METI and NASA (ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003, NASA LP DAAC); imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). Cite as: NASA/METI/AIST/Japan Spacesystems and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team (2019). ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003. doi:10.5067/ASTER/ASTGTM.003. NASA open data
  • Made with Natural Earth. Free vector and raster map data @ naturalearthdata.com. Public domain
  • © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), via NASA GIBS (coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). ODbL
  • Blue Marble, NASA Earth Observatory; imagery via NASA GIBS. Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA open data
  • Context on the globe and flat map: coastlines, boundaries, roads and place names from NASA GIBS reference layers (OpenStreetMap data, ODbL, © OpenStreetMap contributors); Blue Marble imagery as an optional base; 3D terrain and the elevation read-out from the ASTER GDEM elevation colour index (5 m to 200 m classes, exaggerated for legibility). Boundaries are drawn as published and imply no position on any territory.
  • Live events: NASA Earth Observatory Natural Event Tracker (EONET); events are indicative and keep their original source links.
  • Live: NASA EONET Events are indicative, not authority warnings.
  • Live: U.S. Geological Survey Events are indicative, not authority warnings.
  • Live: NOAA GOES-East ABI GeoColor (CIRA). We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA's Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA's Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • NASA GIBS: We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA's Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA's Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
  • Air quality forecast, 5 days, PM2.5 (CAMS via Open-Meteo): Contains modified Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service information 2026.
  • Past year, daily temperature (ERA5 via Open-Meteo): Contains modified Copernicus Climate Change Service information 2026.
  • Weather data by Open-Meteo.com (https://open-meteo.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
  • Optional layers (14 sources in the layer list: live, forecast, observed and context) print their provider credit on the map and here when switched on; forecasts are model output and derived indices are estimates.

Layers and dates

  • Population density, 2020: Population: CIESIN, Columbia University, Gridded Population of the World v4.11 (2018), NASA SEDAC, CC BY 4.0 · static
  • Land surface temperature, day, 8-day composite: VIIRS NOAA-20 Level 3, 8-day, NASA LANCE · 14 Sep 2026
  • Aerosol optical depth, daily: VIIRS NOAA-20 Deep Blue AOD, NASA LANCE · 13 Oct 2026
  • Flood water, 3-day composite: VIIRS Global Flood Product, NASA LANCE · 14 Oct 2026
  • Nitrogen dioxide, lower atmosphere column: OMI Aura, NASA GES DISC · 10 Oct 2026
  • Night-time lights, daily: VIIRS Black Marble (VNP46A2), NASA LAADS DAAC · 12 Oct 2026

04Data

What the method consumes.

Datasets and records used by epidemiology and public health science on this platform, with the role each plays and the label its values carry. Sources are listed in the source register.

DataRoleLabel
Case and death surveillanceDisease burdenREPORTED
Genomic surveillanceVariants and spreadOBSERVED
Serological surveysPopulation immunityESTIMATED
Excess mortality estimatesTotal impactESTIMATED
05Monitor

Epidemic model.

The screen a team would use to follow this method: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.

Epidemic model

Health and biosecurity governance · Epidemiology and public health · Run R-1879

Rt above oneGRF · Health and Biosecurity Governance

Epidemic curve

Method card

Method
Epidemiology and public health science
Model
SEIR, fitted
Generation time
6 days
Label
MODELLED

Parameters

Rt1.00.921.5
Doubling time (days)15436
Reporting fraction0.50.20.9
Epidemic model: the screen's structure, terms and states for Health and biosecurity governance.Example names and illustrative values; a design, not a record or a live system.
06Validation

How results are checked.

Findings are checked through replication, sensitivity analyses and comparison of independent surveillance streams. Transmission models are assessed by out-of-sample forecasting of case counts.

CheckHow it is done
Reporting delayEstimates correct for delays between infection, report and death
AscertainmentThe share of infections detected is estimated and stated
ConfoundingComparisons between places account for differences other than the measure

Reporting delays, under-ascertainment and confounding bias estimates. Behaviour change during outbreaks alters the parameters models rely on.

07Decision model

When measures start, and how much they buy.

How the start day and the strength of contact measures change the size and timing of the peak and the share ever infected, the trade-off a public health decision weighs. Teaching model with stated illustrative values, not a prediction. The map on this page shows Southern Africa; the model itself is not tied to a place.

Controls

Basic reproduction number R0
2.5
Latent period
3.0 days
Infectious period
5.0 days
Share of contacts made in other places
8%
Places in the network
24
Measures start on day
40
Contact reduction from measures
40%
Days simulated
240 days

Readouts

Peak new infections
4.36 per 1,000 a day
Day of the peak
118
Share ever infected
56%
Places reached
100%
Reproduction number under measures
1.50
Numbers, methods and sources
DayNew infections per 1,000Cumulative infected (%)
00.000.0
170.020.0
340.250.2
510.811.1
681.653.2
852.827.1
1023.9212.9
1194.3520.1
1363.9127.2
1533.2933.2
1703.1038.6
1873.1643.9
2042.9549.2
2212.1353.5
2381.1756.2

Methods

  1. SEIR compartments Kermack and McKendrick (1927), Proc. R. Soc. A 115
  2. Metapopulation coupling by mobility Balcan and others (2009), PNAS 106
  3. Small-world network Watts and Strogatz (1998), Nature 393
  4. Modelling infectious diseases Keeling and Rohani (2008), Princeton University Press
  5. Uncertainty fan (parameter Monte Carlo) Spiegelhalter, Pearson and Short (2011), Visualising uncertainty about the future, Science 333
  6. One-at-a-time sensitivity (tornado) Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley

Data

The model runs on the teaching values set by the controls. To calibrate it for a place, read it against these admitted layers and series, which this page's map can draw:

  • Cities Natural Earth
  • Airports Natural Earth
  • Major roads Natural Earth
When measures start, and how much they buy. Illustrative teaching model: it runs on the values set by the controls, not on measured data. Methods: SEIR compartments (Kermack and McKendrick (1927), Proc. R. Soc. A 115); Metapopulation coupling by mobility (Balcan and others (2009), PNAS 106); Small-world network (Watts and Strogatz (1998), Nature 393).
09Implementation

From mandate to evaluation, by pillar.

The steps an instrument takes from mandate to evaluation, each with the pillar that runs it, and the decisions that stay with the authority. Teaching model with stated illustrative values, not a prediction. The map on this page shows Southern Africa; the model itself is not tied to a place.

  1. Mandate and problem framing Competent authority (outside the programme)
    A competent authority frames the problem and the mandate under its own rules. Howlett, Ramesh and Perl (2009)
  2. Evidence and system model Foundry
    The system is modelled with its feedbacks, data and stated limits. OECD (2014), principle 2
  3. Options appraised with scenarios Foundry
    Instruments are compared under scenarios, with uncertainty shown. Hood (1983)
  4. Exercise with stakeholders Universe
    The options are tested in an exercise with those who would implement and bear them. OECD (2014), principle 3
  5. Standard or guidance drafted Nexus Standards
    What works is codified as a standard or guidance, open to comment. Nexus Standards process
  6. Decision by the authority Competent authority (outside the programme)
    The authority decides, outside the programme, with the evidence on record. Howlett, Ramesh and Perl (2009)
  7. Capacity and training Risk Academy
    Those who implement are trained on the decided instrument and its data. Sendai Framework (2015), priority 2
  8. Monitoring and public report Reports
    Indicators are published with sources, limits and corrections. OECD (2014), principle 5
  9. Evaluation and revision Nexus Standards
    Results return to the standard and the model: the cycle closes. Howlett, Ramesh and Perl (2009)

Methods

  1. Policy cycle Howlett, Ramesh and Perl (2009), Studying Public Policy, Oxford University Press
  2. Governance of critical risks OECD (2014), Recommendation of the Council on the Governance of Critical Risks
  3. Layered drawing of directed graphs Sugiyama, Tagawa and Toda (1981), IEEE SMC 11
From mandate to evaluation, by pillar: the steps as recorded, each with its pillar; sources as cited on each step.
10Stewardship

Who maintains the method.

Health Nexus stewards epidemiology and public health science for the Consortium and reviews how it is applied across platforms.

11Twin and cascade simulator

Exercise the cascade with the people who decide.

Assembled from the Nexus Standards area profile Health security and One Health: the hazards it names, the systems and communities that carry the loss, the controls and institutions that dampen it and the data that observe it. Pick an initiating event and step through the cascade to see where mandates meet and which decisions fall to whom. The Map view places the run on an example geography with open data. Every weight is a stated assumption. An exercise for dialogue, not a forecast, an assessment or a position. To model a place of your own choosing, open the full System Builder.

Hazards

Controls

  • NS-0 Constitution and principles
  • NS-3 Risk record UNIs (grammar, legacy crosswalk, allocation authority)
  • NS-9 Contextual UNIs (deployments, instances, programme instances)
  • NS-10 Policies and clauses (machine-readable obligations: definition, binding, evaluation and enforcement)
  • NS-11 Verification and monitoring (evidence, attestations, zero-trust conformance observation)
  • NRS-H83 Hazard family: Health system capacity failure (NHS-1 health.system)
  • NRS-H42 Hazard family: Rare and persistent human infections (NHS-1 health.other-human)
  • NRS-H41 Hazard family: Animal-to-human spillover (NHS-1 health.zoonotic)
  • NRS-H43 Hazard family: Livestock and aquaculture epizootics (NHS-1 health.animal-health)
  • NRS-D3 Humanitarian response and resilient recovery
  • NRS-H46 Hazard family: Environmental and product harm to people (NHS-1 health.harm)

Observation

  • WHO Disease Outbreak News (listed for reference)
  • WAHIS animal health events (listed for reference)
  • WorldPop gridded population (listed for reference)
  • International Health Regulations capacity and health emergency preparedness
  • Percentage of bloodstream infections due to selected antimicrobial-resistant organisms

Example geography

  • West Africa: 59 hexagonal cells
  • Night lights tonight, outages (VIIRS Day/Night Band), NASA GIBS
  • Surface water through cloud, 30 m (OPERA DSWx-S1 radar), NASA GIBS
  • Rain rate, last half hour (IMERG), NASA GIBS
13Risk and response

Coupled risk, applied response.

The sectors a policy on pandemic has to coordinate: a choice in one ministry lands in the others.

Choose a context

ACoupled risk across six sectors6 / 15 relations

Sectors · PandemicStress

Illustrative: a teaching cascade over teaching values, not measurements.
BApplied response across six pillars10 / 18 handoffs

Pillars · PandemicKPI

Illustrative applications; the values are published benchmarks, cited in the readout.

In this contextDependence or handoff, heavier is strongerOutside this context

Context

Pandemic

Workforce absence ripples from clinics into grid operations, logistics and farm labour.

W · E · I · F · H · B

Risk

Sectors
4 of 6
Relations
6 of 15
Coupling
0.41 share of total

Hover a corner, a line or a row to trace it across both sides.

Route

Applied to pandemic

L · F · U · S · R · A

Response

Pillars
4 of 6
Handoffs
10 of 18
Loops
5 closed

Expected value

What is at stake
$60B+expected losses a yearCommission on a Global Health Risk Framework, 2016
Return on resilience
–no published benchmark
Avoided loss
–no published benchmark

Hover a pillar, a line or a row to read how it is applied.

A: a teaching cascade (shock 0.6, gain 0.35, four rounds) over teaching values for a typical city-region, not measurements. B: illustrative applications and the KPI each pillar answers for; values are published benchmarks, cited, not forecasts. Open events: NASA EONET, live.

14Questions

Questions and answers.

What are the limits of epidemiology and public health science in this field?
Reporting delays, under-ascertainment and confounding bias estimates. Behaviour change during outbreaks alters the parameters models rely on.
How are results checked?
Findings are checked through replication, sensitivity analyses and comparison of independent surveillance streams. Transmission models are assessed by out-of-sample forecasting of case counts.
Are the values on this page real?
The data names, roles and checks are real descriptions of practice. The canvas shows a design of the method's use, not a run; no result is reported here.
Where else is this method applied?
The canonical method page lists every platform that applies it.
15Instruments and commitments

Instruments, mandates and commitments.

The instruments, mandates, actors and accountability arrangements a policymaker, diplomat or development agency works with, citing the agreements that set them. Structures follow the frameworks named. Any state or progress drawn is illustrative, not a record.

Policy instrument matrix

The kinds of instrument available on Epidemiology and public health science at Health and Biosecurity Governance, by level of government and cooperation.

Instrument typeLocalNationalRegionalGlobal
RegulatoryZoning, building codesLaws, standards, licensingHarmonised rulesConventions and treaties
EconomicLocal levies, grantsBudget lines, taxes, insurance schemesRisk pools, regional fundsFinancing mechanisms
InformationLocal warningsDisclosure, early warning, statisticsData sharing arrangementsGlobal monitoring and reporting
InstitutionalLocal committeesLead agencies, coordination councilsRegional bodies and secretariatsMultilateral mandates
CooperativeCommunity agreementsPartnership compactsMemoranda and joint programmesAgreements and joint commitments
A typology after the OECD Recommendation on the Governance of Critical Risks; examples of instrument types, not an inventory of any country's measures.
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction · UNDRRParis Agreement · UNFCCC2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals · United NationsInternational Health Regulations · WHO
ReportsContribute

Contribute evidence from this page.

Reports is the Consortium's quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

Global Risks ForumHealth and Biosecurity GovernanceEvidence Brief
Health and Biosecurity Governance

Bring a governance question to the Forum.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

The Global Risks Forum

Convening · leadership · urgency

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GRF is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.