The Global Risks Forum (GRF)
Governance is the system of rules, roles and relationships through which an institution is directed and held to account. Risk governance applies that system to uncertainty: who identifies risks, who decides what level is acceptable, who acts and who checks. This page defines the discipline, explains why it matters for compounding risk and technology change and sets out the institutional issues experts study.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 3
People and hazards, for this page
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
For discipline and institutional issues, in GRF's situational-awareness reading, the map opens on population density, night lights and flood water, framed on Asia; every other NASA layer, live feed and forecast waits in the layer list.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place; claim ceiling INTEGRATED.
Layers and dates
GeographyFor discipline and institutional issues, in GRF's situational-awareness reading, the map opens on population density, night lights and flood water, framed on Asia; every other NASA layer, live feed and forecast waits in the layer list.
The Governance Nexus field covers comparative governance of institutions and systems exposed to compounding risk and technology change. Experts in it study questions such as organizational governance and risk governance, with methods such as policy, institutional and decision science as well as decision analysis under uncertainty. Its counterparts at GCRI and GRA look at the same systems through science and finance.
Fig.How GCRI, GRF and GRA share one field while the authorities decide. Design, not a record.
The working screen behind this subject: its structure, terms and states. Names are placeholders and values illustrative.
The discipline joins corporate governance, public administration, regulatory studies, political science and decision science. Its core concepts are decision rights, the allocation of authority to decide; accountability, the obligation to explain and answer for decisions; oversight, independent checking of those who decide; and integrity, the protection of decisions from improper influence.
Risk governance adds the problem of uncertainty. Institutions must decide before evidence is complete, balance competing values, involve those affected and adapt as knowledge changes. Frameworks developed in the risk governance literature distinguish simple, complex, uncertain and ambiguous risks, each needing different processes, from routine expert procedures to broad deliberation.
Technology change adds a further dimension. When consequential choices are embedded in software, platforms or AI systems, the discipline asks how authority and accountability follow them, and how institutions keep the expertise to oversee what they procure. Comparative work across countries and sectors shows that the same governance problem can be handled in very different ways, with very different results.
Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Regulatory capture | The situation in which a regulator comes to serve the interests of those it regulates rather than the public. |
| Due diligence | An ongoing process to identify, prevent, mitigate and account for adverse impacts in operations and supply chains, in OECD guidance. |
| Governance | The system by which an organization is directed, controlled and held accountable for achieving its purpose, as ISO 37000 frames it. |
| Systemic risk | Risk arising from interconnections, where failure in one part can cascade through a whole system. |
Every decision to build, invest, regulate or warn embeds a judgement about acceptable risk. When governance is weak, those judgements are made by default, by the wrong people or too late. The discipline matters because it determines whether evidence reaches decision-makers and whether they are answerable for what they do with it. Who holds which authority is set out on decision-rights context.
The science of risk management is developed by The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) at risk governance and appetite.
The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.