The Global Risks Forum (GRF)
GRF · Diplomacy Nexus
The mission themes Diplomacy Nexus brings to the annual Universe programme, governed by The Global Risks Forum, with its own website at universe.nexus.
Where everything comes together in the annual programme, with the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), GRF and the Global Risks Alliance (GRA) each contributing in its role and capacity. It is led by the Nexus Consortium; its home is universe.nexus.
Programme yearAll phases
Route
Around Universe
The pillars Universe hands work to and receives it from.
L · F · U · S · R · A
and 12 more
| Area | Universe |
|---|---|
| Leadership | GRF steers the annual programme and records each gate decision from G0 to G7, with dissent kept on the record. |
| Strategy | National and regional priorities become the year's missions; the annual mandate at gate G0 sets which missions the programme takes on. |
| Cadence | One year to prepare, one month to build, one week to act and test in Q3, a planned stand-down, then review and renewal in Q4. |
| Ownership | Owns the cycle mandate, mission admission decisions, gate decisions, after-action records and the renewal decision. |
| Process | Twelve phases, from planning to renewal, each closed by a gate or a record. |
| Development | Develops national demand into admitted, qualified missions, and carries the lessons into the next mandate. |
| Simulations | Tests work under exercise control in Action Week with independent evaluators; nothing simulated is reported as observed impact. |
| Reporting | Authorises publication of the year's results at gate G6 and supplies after-action and scenario findings. |
| Governance | GRF governs the programme; a cycle gate is a programme decision, not a public-authority approval. |
| Data and evidence | Run, decision and observation records from Action Week are sealed at closeout, gate G5. |
| Finance and resourcing | Data, people and resource offers are qualified before the build at gate G2; an offer is not an allocation. |
| Risk and assurance | Exercise controls and stop-work events keep Action Week controlled, reversible and independently evaluated. |
| Participation | Governments, agencies, researchers, finance, civil society and communities take part through missions, tracks and national contributions. |
| Communication | Mission themes are presented as proposals until admitted, and confirmed exercises are announced with their gate record. |
| Local | Exercises run on named places and systems, under exercise control. |
| National | National demand forms the agenda, and national counterparts own the agenda, data and decisions. |
| Regional | Regional programmes contribute missions that cross borders. |
| Planetary | The annual programme brings national and regional work together once a year. |
| Pillar | GCRI | GRF | GRA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Universe | Its technical office prepares the scientific and data readiness of each mission. | Stewards and governs the programme: the mandate, gates G0 to G7, convening and Action Week. | Runs finance-readiness dialogues on what each mission means for finance and insurance. |
A diplomacy mission tests notification and consultation procedures between riparian institutions or neighbouring authorities in a flood, spill or outbreak scenario, with each side's own rules applied.
Universe · Diplomacy · Week 35 · Example interface, not a record
controlled sessions
Diplomacy Nexus · Action week. Action week: example names and illustrative values, not a record.
Proposed for controlled testing in the annual programme; a theme is not a confirmed exercise.
Process
An exercise needs objectives, qualified environments and independent evaluators; GRF authorises controlled live operation, evidence is sealed and the review keeps dissent.
Universe · The programme year · A national missionDesigned programme process, not a record of operation. No cycle has run and every programme is at service level R0. A gate is a programme decision, never a public-authority approval, certification or deployment authorisation. The one-day stand-down is still proposed.
Selected work is tested under controlled conditions, reviewed and then published with its limits. Results that pass go to Reports. The planned stand-down of each edition keeps review, reconciliation and corrections going after the event.
The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.
Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.
Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.
Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.
GRF is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.
Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.
Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.