GRF · Diplomacy Nexus
Dialogues and cooperation
Institutional dialogues in diplomacy Nexus: structured conversations that compare evidence and options among the people who decide.
The workspace for dialogues and cooperation.
Negotiation track desk
Shared basin dialogue · Round 6 · Example interface, not a record
Track
- Conveneparties
- Fact-findingjoint
- Optionsshared
- Draft textbrackets
- Agreementparties decide
- Implementmonitor
Draft text, articles
| Art. 3 | Data exchange | 1 | Agreed ad ref |
| Art. 5 | Low-flow sharing | 5 | Open |
| Art. 7 | Notification of works | 3 | Open |
| Art. 9 | Dispute avoidance | 5 | Not discussed |
Facilitator note
- Next round
- week 8
- Format
- closed, non-attribution
- Decision
- parties only
- GRF role
- convenes, records
Diplomacy Nexus · Negotiation track desk. Negotiation track desk: example names and illustrative values, not a record.
Dialogues are listed when confirmed.
Each dialogue appears here once confirmed, with its host, format and terms. To propose one, write to the registration form.
Unofficial channels that prepare formal ones.
Diplomacy distinguishes formal negotiation between states (Track 1) from unofficial dialogue among experts, former public servants and civil society (Track 2), and community-level exchange (Track 3). Track 2 dialogue lets participants explore options their governments cannot yet propose, under the Chatham House Rule or full confidentiality. Diplomacy Nexus convenes Track 2 and Track 3 formats only; it never negotiates for any state.
| Format | Typical question | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Track 2 expert dialogue | What data-sharing arrangement could riparian states accept? | Non-attributed options paper |
| Joint fact-finding | Can parties agree on the facts before arguing about meaning? | Agreed fact base with disputed points listed |
| Community exchange | How do border communities experience a shared hazard? | Record of community perspectives, with consent |
How the process runs.
Process explorer · Process
Dialogues and cooperation: Cross-border dialogue
7 steps·3 stages
Process
Dialogues and cooperation: Cross-border dialogue
The programme gathers national questions, finds shared dependencies and classifies evidence; parties may decline, decide for themselves, and the programme creates no treaty.
01 Questions and dependencies
- 01National questionsStep · National DesksNational Desks collect material questions, capability gaps and candidate missions.
- 03Shared dependencies identifiedStepRegional coordination identifies shared basins, grids, health systems, ports, corridors and digital links.
02 Evidence and participation
- 02Escalation of a standards disputeComponentEscalation runs from dialogue to mediation, then to a process appeal. No binding arbitration is imposed on a sovereign entity.
- 04Evidence reviewStep · the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)GCRI’s evidence process classifies what is observed, unknown, modelled and worth testing.
- 05National structures may declineDecision · National structuresNational structures may decline participation or data sharing. National data, records and decisions stay under national control.
- 06Questions stay at the lowest capable levelComponentNo upper level can override a national council on a national question.
03 Outside the programme
- 07Parties decide under their own authorityActor · The partiesCross-border work creates no treaty, customs arrangement, sovereignty transfer or right to move data.
The global level · Decision rights · National Standards CouncilDesigned programme process, not a record of operation. No cycle has run and every programme is at service level R0. A gate is a programme decision, never a public-authority approval, certification or deployment authorisation. No negotiation, joint fact-finding or drafting process is described in the published documents.
Shared facts from a neutral source.
Joint fact-finding depends on evidence no party controls. Hydrological and ocean evidence comes from Water Nexus and GCRI oceans and coasts; see shared water and energy systems.
Where this page’s references lead.
The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.
Questions and answers.
Are dialogues public?
Bring a governance question to the Forum.
Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.
Legal documents.
Show all 18 legal documents
Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.