Health and Biosecurity Governance
The Global Risks Forum (GRF)
Health and Biosecurity Governance is a specialist platform of The Global Risks Forum (GRF), in development at its canonical address. Its subject is the governance of health security: the institutions, laws and cooperation arrangements through which countries and communities prevent, prepare for and respond to health threats, including biological risks. This page sets out who publishes it, its mandate, the professional status of those who take part and the limits on its role.
GRF · In development · service level R0
Health and Biosecurity Governance is a specialist platform of The Global Risks Forum for health and biosecurity. Its mandate covers health security, pandemic cooperation, One Health and biosafety institutions across borders. GRF publishes it, answers for its content and takes no decision on anyone's behalf. It is in development at service level R0, and activities open as each is ready.
Fig.How the platform is governed, from its mandate to the authorities who decide. Design, not a record.
For mandate, publisher and status, in GRF's situational-awareness reading, the map opens on population density, flood water and night lights, framed on Southern Africa; 3 further NASA layers wait in the list.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 3
People and hazards, for this page
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
For mandate, publisher and status, in GRF's situational-awareness reading, the map opens on population density, flood water and night lights, framed on Southern Africa; 3 further NASA layers wait in the list.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place; claim ceiling INTEGRATED.
Layers and dates
The platform's thesis is health security, pandemic cooperation, One Health and biosafety institutions across borders.
Comparison of how health security institutions are organized, mandated and held accountable.
Ethical and legal analysis of preparedness, response, data sharing and biological risk oversight.
Dialogues that help institutions coordinate before a crisis, recorded and published.
Health and Biosecurity Governance is a proposed specialist community, in development, for the institutions that implement the International Health Regulations and prepare for the Pandemic Agreement: health ministries, National IHR Authorities, border, agriculture and veterinary agencies, and regional health bodies. It addresses capacity, coordination and oversight only, and publishes no technical detail on biological agents.
GRF publishes the platform and answers for what appears on it. GRF is a Swiss association with a public-good, not-for-profit purpose, and one of the three pillar institutions of Nexus Consortiums, with The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) and The Global Risks Alliance (GRA).
The platform exists separately because health governance professionals form an audience distinct from clinical and bioengineering research, which sits with GCRI. Health and Biosecurity Governance is in development. Its pages set out its scope and how it is designed to work, and its dialogues, records and outputs are published here as each one opens. The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. Contributors take part in their professional capacity and do not represent GRF.
Health decisions remain with the competent national and international authorities; see decision-rights context.
The platform belongs to the health and biosecurity field. Its science counterparts are Health Nexus and Biotechnology and Biosecurity at GCRI, and its finance counterpart is Insurance Nexus at GRA. Read discipline and institutional issues for the field.
Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Service level R0 | The current service level of Nexus pages: information and enquiries only. An enquiry receives a reference and a named next step; it creates no membership, contract, assignment or commitment. |
| Conflict of interest | A situation in which financial, professional or personal interests could compromise, or appear to compromise, judgement in research or review. |
| International Health Regulations | A binding WHO instrument that sets obligations on states to detect, assess, notify and respond to public health risks that may spread internationally. |
| Pandemic emergency | The highest alert level under the amended IHR, for a public health emergency of international concern with wide spread and severe effects. |
The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.
The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.