GRF · AI and Digital Governance

Situational awarenessEvents, outlooks and readiness for those who decide

Programmes and projects

How AI and Digital Governance organizes work into programmes: global priorities, regional applications and country work, each shown with its actual status.

01Workspace

The working screen for programmes and projects.

Workstream tracker

Programmes and projects · Programme year 1 · Example interface, not a record

Two milestones at riskGRF · AI and Digital Governance

Workstreams

owner · stage · status

Agent liability studyOversight bodyScopingM7 · week 16On track
Data sharing governanceOversight bodyScopingM5 · week 21Blocked
Public algorithm registerAffected-persons representativeReviewM2 · week 19On track
Cross-border AI cooperationPublic agency deployerBuildM4 · week 11At risk
Procurement clauses for AIProcurement leadScopingM4 · week 12Blocked

Effort against plan

person-weeks

Agent liability study13 pw of 35 pw requiredData sharing…28 pw of 44 pw requiredPublic algorithm…13 pw of 39 pw requiredCross-border AI…49 pw of 24 pw required

Milestones

  1. W5M1Agent liability study: scoping note signed
  2. W13M2Inputs qualified at the gate
  3. W20M3Data sharing governance: build review
  4. W28M4Controlled test with observers
  5. W43M5Publication and decision record

AI and Digital Governance · Workstream trackerWorkstream tracker, in outline: domain structure with placeholder names and illustrative values, not a record.

03Canvas

Scoping to review.

Canvas · scoping to reviewDesign, not a record
Programmes and projects: a programme through its gatesA request with a named owner becomes a scoping note; inputs are qualified at a gate; delivery runs in workstreams; a controlled test and an independent review precede publication; the owner decides. Design of the process, not a record of a run.

Fig.A programme from scoping to the owner's decision. Design, not a record.

04Programme lines

Lines the community is designed to run.

LineProcess it follows
International AI cooperationUN Global Dialogue on AI Governance and the Independent International Scientific Panel on AI
Public sector AICouncil of Europe convention duties; national algorithm registers
Staged complianceEU AI Act application, including the 2026 Digital Omnibus changes to high-risk timelines
Digital cooperationGlobal Digital Compact; WSIS+20 outcome of December 2025, which made the Internet Governance Forum permanent
05Status

Every programme shows where it stands.

A programme is shown as exploring, forming, constituted, active, paused or archived, according to its record. A plan is never presented as an activity.

06Sources

Where this page's references lead.

The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.

07Pages

Pages in Programmes and projects.

08Questions

Questions and answers.

How does a country take part?
Through its national programme. Country enquiries go to the Consortium Secretariat at contact@therisk.global or a regional desk.
NRNexus Reports gateway · GW-GRF

Contribute to Nexus Reports from this page.

Nexus Reports is the Consortium's quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

Global Risk ForumAI and Digital GovernanceExponential TechnologyEvidence Brief
AI and Digital Governance

Bring a governance question to the Forum.

The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

Legal

Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.

Skip to toolbar