Deliberated scenarios

The scenarios the convenings discussed, and what participants said would change their view.

In preparation. This GRF chapter is not written yet; it holds no findings.
Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. 1What was asked, and by whom
  3. 2Conclusions and dissent
  4. 3Positions by sector
  5. 4Public concerns
  6. 5Deliberated scenarios
    1. 5.1 What this chapter will report
    2. 5.2 Where the evidence sits now
    3. 5.3 Contribute to this chapter
  7. 6Readings from the other desks
  8. 7Commitments asked for
  9. 8Session records

5.1What this chapter will report

The scenarios the convenings discussed, and what participants said would change their view.

It answers the frame question "scenario" in the terms of the Global Risks Forum (GRF) Public Deliberation, so the Collection can set it beside chapter 5 of the other desks’ editions.

5.2Where the evidence sits now

The nearest material today is chapter 5 of the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) Systems Evidence edition for Senegal: scenario cascade. It is a cross-reference, not a copy, and it is a draft in stewardship review.

Downloads

The print edition of the evidence this chapter cross-references: the GCRI Systems Evidence edition for Senegal.

Draft, not yet releasedThe print and files of the GCRI edition this desk’s edition cross-references. Review copies until release; the DOI is issued at deposit.

  • Print

    • PDF, A4

      The GCRI Systems Evidence print edition for this subject, A4: cover, imprint, contents with page numbers, every chapter and annex.

      PDF110 pages913 KBTagged, with bookmarks

      SHA-256 99a95b51e51170c4b5c68983deaecb045f3e43f803710dec08b12472be8d98a5

    • PDF, US Letter

      The GCRI Systems Evidence print edition for this subject, US Letter: cover, imprint, contents with page numbers, every chapter and annex.

      PDF118 pages924 KBTagged, with bookmarks

      SHA-256 b8cf793bc241f1b7d16e64a5f444d56ebbc129dbdbe9eafa67443d096f9eff79

  • Web edition

  • Data bundle

    • Indicators, CSV

      22 indicators with unit, year, status and source

      NR-COUNTRY-SEN-2026-BASELINE-indicators.csv1 KB

      SHA-256 df53650159acba091fdab3a988496b961279ba4263edd81bcf0d940a0e09f0a1

    • Indicators, JSON

      The same indicators with the edition’s identity and licence

      NR-COUNTRY-SEN-2026-BASELINE-indicators.json3 KB

      SHA-256 e4b714fcb2ee51dadfea5e3a09fba7dc2e5727b660ddbbb642c3494869dc2316

    • Findings, CSV

      12 findings with status, evidence-quality level and references

      NR-COUNTRY-SEN-2026-BASELINE-findings.csv3 KB

      SHA-256 43e84c8ccd9f94f9d0b2700d16523e73fe0ed90e530f112eeeb6a35a078f2dc8

  • Citation files

    • Citation, BibTeX

      For LaTeX and reference managers

      NR-COUNTRY-SEN-2026-BASELINE.bib1 KB

      SHA-256 585a5600e1dfcab88dceb7e403c57b3b3cb033b4fd55dc4ee4c1ded737c3c6bf

    • Citation, RIS

      For Zotero, EndNote and Mendeley

      NR-COUNTRY-SEN-2026-BASELINE.ris1 KB

      SHA-256 4db9e0fb40d3421885d29cb0eb284e0f14d30db2089bec13d6eae8c8f82e9d07

    • Citation, CITATION.cff

      Citation File Format 1.2.0, for GitHub, Zenodo and software catalogues

      NR-COUNTRY-SEN-2026-BASELINE.cff1 KB

      SHA-256 b0a8cb8060f336ae3f541250eab40af12ff1929aebc4e9e174a164c16d845e37

Check a file with its SHA-256: shasum -a 256 <file> (macOS, Linux) or Get-FileHash <file> (Windows). Text, tables and figures by Nexus: CC BY 4.0; each source keeps its own licence.

5.3Contribute to this chapter

The record of deliberation: what a convening, council, dialogue or working group was asked, what it concluded, where participants disagreed and which questions stayed open. Material for this chapter goes to the GRF Public Deliberation desk; what belongs to another desk is forwarded, not refused.

The Forum reads an edition for public meaning: what a finding means for governance, diplomacy and trust, and how it can be said without overclaiming.

If you took part in a convening, send the record and say which body held it. The Forum will ask each participant before it names them.

ReportsContribute

Contribute to chapter 5 of Public Deliberation: Senegal 2026.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the GRF Public Deliberation desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GRF Public Deliberation deskGRF Public Deliberation

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

Your role here

What you can do from this page.

  • ReaderFound an error? Every correction is public.Corrections log
  • ContributorSend evidence, data or a correction to this desk.Contribute
  • ReviewerReview for this desk; verified reviews are credited.Become a reviewer
  • Editor, steward or boardQueues, decisions and production are in the workspace.My workspace
The Global Risks Forum

Convening · leadership · urgency

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GRF is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.