Positions by sector

The positions stated by sector and by type of body, attributed to those who hold them.

In preparation. This GRF chapter is not written yet; it holds no findings.
Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. 1What was asked, and by whom
  3. 2Conclusions and dissent
  4. 3Positions by sector
    1. 3.1 What this chapter will report
    2. 3.2 Where the evidence sits now
    3. 3.3 Contribute to this chapter
  5. 4Public concerns
  6. 5Deliberated scenarios
  7. 6Readings from the other desks
  8. 7Commitments asked for
  9. 8Session records

3.1What this chapter will report

The positions stated by sector and by type of body, attributed to those who hold them.

It answers the frame question "by system and sector" in the terms of the Global Risks Forum (GRF) Public Deliberation, so the Collection can set it beside chapter 3 of the other desks’ editions.

3.2Where the evidence sits now

The nearest material today is chapter 3 of the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) Systems Evidence edition for MENA: systems and sectors. It is a cross-reference, not a copy, and it is a draft in stewardship review.

Downloads

The print edition of the evidence this chapter cross-references: the GCRI Systems Evidence edition for MENA.

Draft, not yet releasedThe print and files of the GCRI edition this desk’s edition cross-references. Review copies until release; the DOI is issued at deposit.

  • Print

    • PDF, A4

      The GCRI Systems Evidence print edition for this subject, A4: cover, imprint, contents with page numbers, every chapter and annex.

      PDF116 pages998 KBTagged, with bookmarks

      SHA-256 25bec93ee7b9bbf23a0c2a9b3e1bed78b78f6f930d15d6756041c3e530d4e815

    • PDF, US Letter

      The GCRI Systems Evidence print edition for this subject, US Letter: cover, imprint, contents with page numbers, every chapter and annex.

      PDF125 pages1016 KBTagged, with bookmarks

      SHA-256 43ba38202af15f0e40c95030969d16a4d584f6e6fefb1168b012b24a7acaebdc

  • Web edition

  • Data bundle

    • Indicators, CSV

      19 indicators with unit, year, status and source

      NR-REGIONAL-MEN-2026-BASELINE-indicators.csv1 KB

      SHA-256 0421b9a14907efbafb50e98b576c4af988e250200efde1d47ed5fcdc05421371

    • Indicators, JSON

      The same indicators with the edition’s identity and licence

      NR-REGIONAL-MEN-2026-BASELINE-indicators.json2 KB

      SHA-256 9d9876461e75aea6dfa85acfd3d44c1e6c3d68323a4b35d6ffedee8dad6cdb38

    • Findings, CSV

      12 findings with status, evidence-quality level and references

      NR-REGIONAL-MEN-2026-BASELINE-findings.csv3 KB

      SHA-256 2d5b54f82c1cbd491f5da0e3705549ffe6bf517d0fbf9efe6c50644dc7ce9c90

  • Citation files

    • Citation, BibTeX

      For LaTeX and reference managers

      NR-REGIONAL-MEN-2026-BASELINE.bib1 KB

      SHA-256 048ef2d4719d414ce0d0a1de023a5fdbf32e4afe9522800e81bcad344f07c476

    • Citation, RIS

      For Zotero, EndNote and Mendeley

      NR-REGIONAL-MEN-2026-BASELINE.ris1 KB

      SHA-256 5b6918e2251bde56c4745d815b27d4fdbf617375116c3e77e66c97c88be9c34d

    • Citation, CITATION.cff

      Citation File Format 1.2.0, for GitHub, Zenodo and software catalogues

      NR-REGIONAL-MEN-2026-BASELINE.cff1 KB

      SHA-256 04270b83fe4086346e6b626192f29508ab8195dbab9639101f766591fd4a2ac5

Check a file with its SHA-256: shasum -a 256 <file> (macOS, Linux) or Get-FileHash <file> (Windows). Text, tables and figures by Nexus: CC BY 4.0; each source keeps its own licence.

3.3Contribute to this chapter

The record of deliberation: what a convening, council, dialogue or working group was asked, what it concluded, where participants disagreed and which questions stayed open. Material for this chapter goes to the GRF Public Deliberation desk; what belongs to another desk is forwarded, not refused.

The Forum reads an edition for public meaning: what a finding means for governance, diplomacy and trust, and how it can be said without overclaiming.

If you took part in a convening, send the record and say which body held it. The Forum will ask each participant before it names them.

ReportsContribute

Contribute to chapter 3 of Public Deliberation: MENA 2026.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the GRF Public Deliberation desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GRF Public Deliberation deskGRF Public Deliberation

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

Your role here

What you can do from this page.

  • ReaderFound an error? Every correction is public.Corrections log
  • ContributorSend evidence, data or a correction to this desk.Contribute
  • ReviewerReview for this desk; verified reviews are credited.Become a reviewer
  • Editor, steward or boardQueues, decisions and production are in the workspace.My workspace
The Global Risks Forum

Convening · leadership · urgency

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GRF is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.