Deliberated scenarios

The scenarios the convenings discussed, and what participants said would change their view.

In preparation. This GRF chapter is not written yet; it holds no findings.
Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. 1What was asked, and by whom
  3. 2Conclusions and dissent
  4. 3Positions by sector
  5. 4Public concerns
  6. 5Deliberated scenarios
    1. 5.1 What this chapter will report
    2. 5.2 Where the evidence sits now
    3. 5.3 Contribute to this chapter
  7. 6Readings from the other desks
  8. 7Commitments asked for
  9. 8Session records

5.1What this chapter will report

The scenarios the convenings discussed, and what participants said would change their view.

It answers the frame question "scenario" in the terms of the Global Risks Forum (GRF) Public Deliberation, so the Collection can set it beside chapter 5 of the other desks’ editions.

5.2Where the evidence sits now

The nearest material today is chapter 5 of the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) Systems Evidence edition for ASEAN: scenario cascade. It is a cross-reference, not a copy, and it is a draft in stewardship review.

Downloads

The print edition of the evidence this chapter cross-references: the GCRI Systems Evidence edition for ASEAN.

Draft, not yet releasedThe print and files of the GCRI edition this desk’s edition cross-references. Review copies until release; the DOI is issued at deposit.

  • Print

    • PDF, A4

      The GCRI Systems Evidence print edition for this subject, A4: cover, imprint, contents with page numbers, every chapter and annex.

      PDF108 pages926 KBTagged, with bookmarks

      SHA-256 cb9435432b923e8bc4c5b6193781a83cad74235ae0fa31fa91d692533731dfcb

    • PDF, US Letter

      The GCRI Systems Evidence print edition for this subject, US Letter: cover, imprint, contents with page numbers, every chapter and annex.

      PDF118 pages945 KBTagged, with bookmarks

      SHA-256 a2c08560fbda767db336bef412bae7955fd6296e76448da5b0bb5f7850e831f2

  • Web edition

  • Data bundle

    • Indicators, CSV

      22 indicators with unit, year, status and source

      NR-REGIONAL-ASN-2026-BASELINE-indicators.csv1 KB

      SHA-256 b534040f6ecb2cc85de7be6d4e79071f0642d0549598a66ada8152c0d62fdd64

    • Indicators, JSON

      The same indicators with the edition’s identity and licence

      NR-REGIONAL-ASN-2026-BASELINE-indicators.json3 KB

      SHA-256 a5a5c67473506ab367d7cad7975f3c2f59a9e78792223b314eda1f1cb3153a8d

    • Findings, CSV

      12 findings with status, evidence-quality level and references

      NR-REGIONAL-ASN-2026-BASELINE-findings.csv3 KB

      SHA-256 4b71a4d0b6736a5bfa83cee0cf771f733361da35193c22a46a40c1bd24e371b9

  • Citation files

    • Citation, BibTeX

      For LaTeX and reference managers

      NR-REGIONAL-ASN-2026-BASELINE.bib1 KB

      SHA-256 7c04f0660365ac86df5925954367db683cf2eb665dc97fbc7e275f14de793403

    • Citation, RIS

      For Zotero, EndNote and Mendeley

      NR-REGIONAL-ASN-2026-BASELINE.ris1 KB

      SHA-256 6220a715d511e2e317bf81769317efa8c9b27dfee95ae67fa131ae3bd5ebc333

    • Citation, CITATION.cff

      Citation File Format 1.2.0, for GitHub, Zenodo and software catalogues

      NR-REGIONAL-ASN-2026-BASELINE.cff1 KB

      SHA-256 fb554e832ca61cbb208ca3077ae80f9c52e737ba7ce265464585c07d41454690

Check a file with its SHA-256: shasum -a 256 <file> (macOS, Linux) or Get-FileHash <file> (Windows). Text, tables and figures by Nexus: CC BY 4.0; each source keeps its own licence.

5.3Contribute to this chapter

The record of deliberation: what a convening, council, dialogue or working group was asked, what it concluded, where participants disagreed and which questions stayed open. Material for this chapter goes to the GRF Public Deliberation desk; what belongs to another desk is forwarded, not refused.

The Forum reads an edition for public meaning: what a finding means for governance, diplomacy and trust, and how it can be said without overclaiming.

If you took part in a convening, send the record and say which body held it. The Forum will ask each participant before it names them.

ReportsContribute

Contribute to chapter 5 of Public Deliberation: ASEAN 2026.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the GRF Public Deliberation desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GRF Public Deliberation deskGRF Public Deliberation

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

Your role here

What you can do from this page.

  • ReaderFound an error? Every correction is public.Corrections log
  • ContributorSend evidence, data or a correction to this desk.Contribute
  • ReviewerReview for this desk; verified reviews are credited.Become a reviewer
  • Editor, steward or boardQueues, decisions and production are in the workspace.My workspace
The Global Risks Forum

Convening · leadership · urgency

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GRF is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.