Deliberated scenarios

The scenarios the convenings discussed, and what participants said would change their view.

In preparation. This GRF chapter is not written yet; it holds no findings.
Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. 1What was asked, and by whom
  3. 2Conclusions and dissent
  4. 3Positions by sector
  5. 4Public concerns
  6. 5Deliberated scenarios
    1. 5.1 What this chapter will report
    2. 5.2 Where the evidence sits now
    3. 5.3 Contribute to this chapter
  7. 6Readings from the other desks
  8. 7Commitments asked for
  9. 8Session records

5.1What this chapter will report

The scenarios the convenings discussed, and what participants said would change their view.

It answers the frame question "scenario" in the terms of the Global Risks Forum (GRF) Public Deliberation, so the Collection can set it beside chapter 5 of the other desks’ editions.

5.2Where the evidence sits now

The nearest material today is chapter 5 of the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) Systems Evidence edition for Africa: scenario cascade. It is a cross-reference, not a copy, and it is a draft in stewardship review.

Downloads

The print edition of the evidence this chapter cross-references: the GCRI Systems Evidence edition for Africa.

Draft, not yet releasedThe print and files of the GCRI edition this desk’s edition cross-references. Review copies until release; the DOI is issued at deposit.

  • Print

    • PDF, A4

      The GCRI Systems Evidence print edition for this subject, A4: cover, imprint, contents with page numbers, every chapter and annex.

      PDF110 pages922 KBTagged, with bookmarks

      SHA-256 76ef3eafbaf2674813722d441434a847652a745309e98b674038290bac6287ea

    • PDF, US Letter

      The GCRI Systems Evidence print edition for this subject, US Letter: cover, imprint, contents with page numbers, every chapter and annex.

      PDF116 pages933 KBTagged, with bookmarks

      SHA-256 2444ec38a596a54aefb811831fd34c3ff3faa460a5d86370ba8aebade78ab02e

  • Web edition

  • Data bundle

    • Indicators, CSV

      20 indicators with unit, year, status and source

      NR-REGIONAL-AFR-2026-BASELINE-indicators.csv1 KB

      SHA-256 ca43920f5215706afa619f791d969ac3b434514eb760e9a6eb698b5698ea139b

    • Indicators, JSON

      The same indicators with the edition’s identity and licence

      NR-REGIONAL-AFR-2026-BASELINE-indicators.json2 KB

      SHA-256 02e298d237b1536ef588285bd9ca753337a1a449e7990af3bd8b12e33a96a8be

    • Findings, CSV

      12 findings with status, evidence-quality level and references

      NR-REGIONAL-AFR-2026-BASELINE-findings.csv3 KB

      SHA-256 818968170edd08183d6ed8e8a494abd4a104a6b8b39adc48490ad69bbad888d1

  • Citation files

    • Citation, BibTeX

      For LaTeX and reference managers

      NR-REGIONAL-AFR-2026-BASELINE.bib1 KB

      SHA-256 8435bd5847ce8a16672c39d7f5536faf29f9e1d9ba58432688d1bc58a81f8f5f

    • Citation, RIS

      For Zotero, EndNote and Mendeley

      NR-REGIONAL-AFR-2026-BASELINE.ris1 KB

      SHA-256 584caf8b4133a0b112554967978756a1a050a9073185cf9cb88c17a9857a6fb9

    • Citation, CITATION.cff

      Citation File Format 1.2.0, for GitHub, Zenodo and software catalogues

      NR-REGIONAL-AFR-2026-BASELINE.cff1 KB

      SHA-256 9004e15af56a778a4034e411b98a3b3f965f78482b87da32fc482727e316693c

Check a file with its SHA-256: shasum -a 256 <file> (macOS, Linux) or Get-FileHash <file> (Windows). Text, tables and figures by Nexus: CC BY 4.0; each source keeps its own licence.

5.3Contribute to this chapter

The record of deliberation: what a convening, council, dialogue or working group was asked, what it concluded, where participants disagreed and which questions stayed open. Material for this chapter goes to the GRF Public Deliberation desk; what belongs to another desk is forwarded, not refused.

The Forum reads an edition for public meaning: what a finding means for governance, diplomacy and trust, and how it can be said without overclaiming.

If you took part in a convening, send the record and say which body held it. The Forum will ask each participant before it names them.

ReportsContribute

Contribute to chapter 5 of Public Deliberation: Africa 2026.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the GRF Public Deliberation desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GRF Public Deliberation deskGRF Public Deliberation

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

Your role here

What you can do from this page.

  • ReaderFound an error? Every correction is public.Corrections log
  • ContributorSend evidence, data or a correction to this desk.Contribute
  • ReviewerReview for this desk; verified reviews are credited.Become a reviewer
  • Editor, steward or boardQueues, decisions and production are in the workspace.My workspace
The Global Risks Forum

Convening · leadership · urgency

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GRF is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.