01What Reports is
Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, and the Global Risks Forum writes the desk that records public deliberation. If you sat in a convening, a council or a dialogue, this is where what you concluded, and where you disagreed, becomes part of the record.

02This desk: Public Deliberation
The Forum holds the public meaning of an edition. It reports what a convening was asked, what it concluded, where participants dissented and which questions stayed open.
Mandate: The record of deliberation: what a convening, council, dialogue or working group was asked, what it concluded, where participants disagreed and which questions stayed open.
Series this desk leads:
- Observatory Signal
- Strategic Systems
- Evidence Brief
03The six desks
Public Deliberation is one of six desks, and it deposits to its own Zenodo community under the flagship.

| Desk | Edition | Zenodo community |
|---|---|---|
| GCRI | Systems Evidence | nexusreports-gcri |
| GRF | Public Deliberation | nexusreports-grf |
| GRA | Capital Readiness | nexusreports-gra |
| NXS | Standards Progress | nexusreports-nxs |
| RA | Capability | nexusreports-ra |
| GRX | Measurement | nexusreports-grx |
04The edition in eight chapters, in this desk’s terms
The frame is shared with the other desks, so a reader can compare a Forum edition with a systems edition chapter by chapter.
| Chapter | Title | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | What was asked, and by whom | The questions put to the convenings of the cycle, and the bodies and roles that put them. |
| 2 | Conclusions and dissent | What the convenings concluded, with the dissent recorded beside each conclusion. |
| 3 | Positions by sector | The positions stated by sector and by type of body, attributed to those who hold them. |
| 4 | Public concerns | The concerns raised by the public and by civil society, as they were raised. |
| 5 | Deliberated scenarios | The scenarios the convenings discussed, and what participants said would change their view. |
| 6 | Readings from the other desks | Readings from the other desks: cross-references to their editions for the same scope, not copies of them. |
| 7 | Commitments asked for | The commitments participants asked of institutions, recorded as requests, not as agreements. |
| 8 | Session records | The record of each session: agenda, participation by role, materials and outcome. |
05How to contribute
Send the Forum the outcome of a convening, a stakeholder position or a recorded dissent. A dissent is not a defect here. It is part of what the desk publishes.
This desk takes:
- The outcome of a convening, with its agenda and who took part, by role
- A stakeholder position, stated by the body that holds it
- A recorded dissent or minority view
- A question a convening left open for the next edition
The gateway page of the GRF Public Deliberation desk gives the route.
06The editorial workflow
A position sent to the Forum follows the same steps as any other work. Reasons for every decision are recorded, so a participant can see why a position was or was not taken up.

| Step | What happens |
|---|---|
| 1. Submit | Contributor declarations and licence terms are signed first. |
| 2. Screen | Editors check scope, completeness and licensing. |
| 3. Review | Peer review runs under the model declared at submission. Authors may revise, then the work returns to review. |
| 4. Decide | Named editors decide and record their reasons. Declined work can be appealed through a separate route. |
| 5. Accept | The decision is recorded and the work moves to production. |
| 6. Publish | A named editor publishes. The DOI is issued. |
07The sixteen-gate quarterly cycle
Convenings run on their own calendar. The cycle tells you the last date a session record can reach the next edition, and the date after which it waits a quarter.

| Order | Gate | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | call_open | The call opens. |
| 2 | call_close | The call closes. |
| 3 | submission_deadline | Last moment to submit into this cycle. Later submissions roll to the next cycle. |
| 4 | triage_close | Intake triage must be finished. |
| 5 | review_open | The review window opens. |
| 6 | reviewer_reminder | First reminder to reviewers. |
| 7 | review_close | Reviews are due. Overdue reviews escalate and are reassigned. |
| 8 | decision_date | The editorial decision is due. |
| 9 | revision_close | The revision window ends. |
| 10 | copyedit_freeze | Copyedit and data-check freeze. |
| 11 | evidence_close | Evidence close. |
| 12 | production_close | Production ends. |
| 13 | release_approval | The named approver signs the release. |
| 14 | release | Release date. It is the anchor of the cycle. |
| 15 | deposit_approval | Zenodo deposit approval. The deposit stays a draft until then. |
| 16 | corrections_close | The corrections window ends. |
08Release control
The checks matter to a participant for one reason. A session record is cited only after the data and legal checks pass, and the approver cannot be one of its authors.

- Check: Peer review passes.
- Check: Data check.
- Check: Citation check.
- Check: Accessibility check.
- Check: Legal check.
- Check: Licence and file rules.
- Check: Approver is not an author.
- The named approver signs a plan bound to the release digest.
- Six artefacts are fixed, each with a SHA-256 checksum: edition-pack, web, print, data-bundle, ro-crate, citation-metadata.
- The Zenodo deposit stays a draft until the deposit approval gate.
- The record is published with a DOI. A correction is a new version that keeps the concept DOI.
09Open licensing
Reusing a deliberation record needs no permission beyond the licence. Text is CC BY 4.0. Say so to participants before they speak on the record.
Licence rules
- Text, figures and maps: CC BY 4.0 (SPDX: CC-BY-4.0).
- Data: CC0 1.0 (SPDX: CC0-1.0).
- Code: an OSI-approved licence.
- Media: CC BY 4.0 or CC0 1.0.
- No NC, ND or SA licence on our own outputs. No paywall, no embargo on text, no fees.
10Zenodo community and DOIs
Session records are deposited to the Forum’s own community on Zenodo. It exists and is curated; the Forum reviews every submission, and no record is in it yet.
This desk’s community: zenodo.org/communities/nexusreports-grf
- Flagship community: nexusreports. It exists and holds records today.
- Every record carries a DOI and a full version history. A correction becomes a new version and keeps the concept DOI.
11The open science stack, with its honest status
Participants with an ORCID can be credited for their contribution. The status of every other integration is shown below.

| Integration | What it does | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Zenodo | DOIs, deposits and versions | Built |
| ORCID | Contributor identity and review credit | Built |
| ROR | Institution identifiers | Needs the id |
| COAR Notify | Inbox for peer review services | Built |
| OAI-PMH | A harvesting endpoint | Built |
| JATS XML | Journal article markup | Built |
| RO-Crate | Research object packaging | Built |
| Crossref | An export, not in use | Export only |
Cite
Reports, GRF Public Deliberation, start here [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) for the Nexus Consortium.
